Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

Discussion regarding the author's statement: "And if one combines a sale and a contract of manumission, or a sale and currency exchange, it is valid in anything other than the contract of manumission."

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : The author says "If one combines a sale and a contract of manumission, it is valid in anything other than the contract of manumission" What does that mean? Abdullah?

The questioner : If one combines two contracts...

The Shaykh : Combining two contracts, or is it in one contract?

The questioner : ... .

The Shaykh : Between what?

The questioner : Between the sale... it is... so it is not valid.

The Shaykh : It is not valid?

The questioner : It is not valid.

The Shaykh : And what is not valid, the sale or the contract of manumission?

The questioner : The sale is not valid.

The Shaykh : The sale is not valid. And the contract of manumission?

The questioner : It is valid.

The Shaykh : For example?

The questioner : That he sells to his slave... and enters into a contract of manumission with him.

The Shaykh : No, that he sells to him and enters into a contract of manumission with him. No, it is one contract; he combined a sale and a contract of manumission in one contract.

The questioner : ... he wrote his contract... .

The Shaykh : The contract of manumission is that he sells his slave to himself.

The questioner : ... .

The Shaykh : The example?

The questioner : Either he says to his slave, buy yourself...

The Shaykh : I sold you this car and entered into a contract of manumission with you.

The questioner : It is a recommended practice.

The Shaykh : No, you do not say for a year or anything, and I entered into a contract of manumission with you for ten thousand.

The questioner : Sell yourself.

The Shaykh : What is not valid?

The questioner : The sale.

The Shaykh : And the contract of manumission?

The questioner : It is valid.

The Shaykh : It is valid, why is the sale not valid?

The questioner : The sale is not valid because he sold... .

The Shaykh : Because the one under a contract of manumission is a slave until he pays off the debt, so he sold his property to his property, understood, good. And if he entered into a contract of manumission with him and then sold, O Adam, he entered into a contract of manumission with him and then sold him the car? Is that permissible?

The questioner : Yes.

The Shaykh : What is the evidence?

The questioner : ... .

The Shaykh : In what?

The questioner : In terms of disposal.

The Shaykh : In terms of disposal, so if he buys it from his master, there is no harm, just as if he bought it from someone else, good, what is the form of their statement combining a sale and currency exchange, and what is its example? Hamid?

The questioner : As if he says, for example, I sold you this item and rented you this house.

The Shaykh : No, a sale and currency exchange? Ahmad?

The questioner : As if he says, I sold you this car and this hundred dirhams for one thousand pounds.

The Shaykh : For one thousand pounds?

The questioner : ... .

The Shaykh : Good, is it correct? This is combining a sale and currency exchange, and that is because the sale of currency for currency is called currency exchange by them, meaning the sale of dinars for dirhams is called currency exchange, even though it is originally a sale, but this is a specific sale because it has specific rulings.
Source alathar.net

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas