What is your opinion of this statement: "The criterion in narration is proof and certainty, and there is no proof in the unknown"?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The recording has been transcribed as: "The criterion in narration is trustworthiness and certainty, and there is no proof in the unknown"
The student: My Shaykh, so here "certainty" is mentioned, but it is not necessary.
The Shaykh : It is an exaggeration.
The student: Yes, the criterion is in
The Shaykh : what is preponderant in probability.
The student: What is preponderant in probability.
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Or he says, for example, "it is authentic," whereas "certainty" is an exaggeration; the mass-transmitted report is
The student: ... mass-transmitted.
The student: My Shaykh, so here "certainty" is mentioned, but it is not necessary.
The Shaykh : It is an exaggeration.
The student: Yes, the criterion is in
The Shaykh : what is preponderant in probability.
The student: What is preponderant in probability.
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Or he says, for example, "it is authentic," whereas "certainty" is an exaggeration; the mass-transmitted report is
The student: ... mass-transmitted.
