Is it permissible to anesthetize the thief and the highway robber when their limbs are amputated?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : ... Is it permissible?
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : That is ... compensated for by the defects.
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The questioner : Is it permissible ...?
The Shaykh : Is it permissible to anesthetize the thief and the highway robber when their limbs are amputated, or is it not permissible?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : It is permissible, it is permissible. May Allah reward you.
The questioner : It is not permissible.
The Shaykh : It is permissible to anesthetize the highway robber and the thief when their limb is amputated, because the intended outcome is the destruction of the limb, not the pain. This is unlike the one upon whom retaliation is obligatory, for it is not permissible to anesthetize him, because it is retaliation, and he must experience the same amount of pain as the victim did. Allahu Akbar, Allahu Akbar.
Praise be to Allah, Lord of the worlds, and may peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, and upon his family and all his Companions. The author (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : ... .
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : The author said: "And if each one took the amount that would be amputated by his taking of the thief, and they did not kill, the right hand and left foot of each one is amputated in one place, and they are cauterized, and then they are released."
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Did we explain this?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Yes, "If they did not take a life or property reaching the threshold for theft, they are expelled.
The questioner : We took it.
The Shaykh : that they be expelled so that they are not left to take refuge in any country .
The Shaykh : We took it.
The Shaykh : Then he said. Yes?
The questioner : Regarding ... if we say by validating ... .
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The questioner : Killed, then killed and crucified, and killing and crucifixion is greater.
The Shaykh : Greater, yes, meaning by which verse do you mean?
The questioner : Yes, in the verse.
The Shaykh : No, no, in the verse, no, it combines this and that.
The questioner : Okay, Shaykh, he is killed and crucified, why ...
The Shaykh : Listen to the lesson, because this is not the place for it.
The Shaykh : What?
The questioner : That is ... compensated for by the defects.
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The questioner : Is it permissible ...?
The Shaykh : Is it permissible to anesthetize the thief and the highway robber when their limbs are amputated, or is it not permissible?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : It is permissible, it is permissible. May Allah reward you.
The questioner : It is not permissible.
The Shaykh : It is permissible to anesthetize the highway robber and the thief when their limb is amputated, because the intended outcome is the destruction of the limb, not the pain. This is unlike the one upon whom retaliation is obligatory, for it is not permissible to anesthetize him, because it is retaliation, and he must experience the same amount of pain as the victim did. Allahu Akbar, Allahu Akbar.
Praise be to Allah, Lord of the worlds, and may peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, and upon his family and all his Companions. The author (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : ... .
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : The author said: "And if each one took the amount that would be amputated by his taking of the thief, and they did not kill, the right hand and left foot of each one is amputated in one place, and they are cauterized, and then they are released."
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Did we explain this?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : Yes, "If they did not take a life or property reaching the threshold for theft, they are expelled.
The questioner : We took it.
The Shaykh : that they be expelled so that they are not left to take refuge in any country .
The Shaykh : We took it.
The Shaykh : Then he said. Yes?
The questioner : Regarding ... if we say by validating ... .
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The questioner : Killed, then killed and crucified, and killing and crucifixion is greater.
The Shaykh : Greater, yes, meaning by which verse do you mean?
The questioner : Yes, in the verse.
The Shaykh : No, no, in the verse, no, it combines this and that.
The questioner : Okay, Shaykh, he is killed and crucified, why ...
The Shaykh : Listen to the lesson, because this is not the place for it.