Some students of knowledge conveyed to the Shaykh the hadithical corroborations for a hadith in *Da'if al-Tirmidhi*, number: (402).
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner: In what does not diminish you, and by what does not diminish you.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: So, glory be to Allah, the hadith is beautiful!
The Shaykh : That is correct.
The questioner: Ah, but as you always say: if this knowledge were based on desire and personal inclination, we would have authenticated hadiths like this one.
The Shaykh: Certainly.
The questioner: Sometimes, glory be to Allah, O our Shaykh, when a person sees a narration like this, he tries to trace it and expand upon it, and so on.
The Shaykh: To free it from weakness.
The questioner: Yes, by Allah.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: So I found two corroborations for it.
The Shaykh : Very good.
The questioner: So I said, meaning: we will present them to our Shaykh, perhaps he will see something else, or give us his opinion on them.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: Of course, the hadith, O our Shaykh, you mentioned it in *Da'if al-Tirmidhi*.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner: Number:.
The Shaykh: A moment, by Allah.
The questioner: Please, O our Shaykh, and you cited *al-Ta'liq al-Raghib*:, meaning, to save you the trouble.
The Shaykh: Okay, it is weak!
The questioner: *al-Raghib*.
The Shaykh: Okay, *Da'if al-Targhib*, number: 11.
The questioner: No, Part Four, Volume Four, number: 11, *al-Ta'liq al-Raghib*, page: 11, excuse me.
The Shaykh: So it is not *Da'if al-Targhib*!
The questioner: No, no, *al-Ta'liq al-Raghib*.
The Shaykh: *al-Ta'liq al-Raghib*!
The questioner: *Da'if al-Targhib* has not yet been seen by the eyes, O our Shaykh!
The Shaykh: Not yet, yes, *al-Ta'liq al-Raghib*, number: 11, Part?
The questioner: No, Part Four, page: 11.
The Shaykh: Ah, this is *al-Ta'liq al-Raghib*, okay, what else?
The questioner: Page: 11.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: This is the text you wrote, of course, so I do not know if you mentioned any of this or not, so I say I have nothing, O our Shaykh.
The Shaykh: Go ahead.
The questioner: The first corroboration is in *al-Samt* by Ibn Abi al-Dunya, number:, from Ka'b ibn Ujrah.
The Shaykh: Number:.
The questioner: From Ka'b ibn Ujrah.
The Shaykh: Okay, what else?
The questioner: And the second corroboration is in Abu Ya'la, from Abu Hurayrah:.
The Shaykh: Six thousand and six hundred?
The questioner: And forty-six, of course, both are weak in chain.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: So this is what is before you.
The Shaykh : May Allah reward you with good.
The questioner: May Allah preserve you, O our Shaykh.
The Shaykh : May Allah honor you.
The questioner: And you as well, O my professor.
The Shaykh : Welcome.
The questioner : Peace be upon you, and Allah’s mercy and blessings.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: So, glory be to Allah, the hadith is beautiful!
The Shaykh : That is correct.
The questioner: Ah, but as you always say: if this knowledge were based on desire and personal inclination, we would have authenticated hadiths like this one.
The Shaykh: Certainly.
The questioner: Sometimes, glory be to Allah, O our Shaykh, when a person sees a narration like this, he tries to trace it and expand upon it, and so on.
The Shaykh: To free it from weakness.
The questioner: Yes, by Allah.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: So I found two corroborations for it.
The Shaykh : Very good.
The questioner: So I said, meaning: we will present them to our Shaykh, perhaps he will see something else, or give us his opinion on them.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: Of course, the hadith, O our Shaykh, you mentioned it in *Da'if al-Tirmidhi*.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner: Number:
402
402The Shaykh: A moment, by Allah.
The questioner: Please, O our Shaykh, and you cited *al-Ta'liq al-Raghib*:
4 / 11
4 / 11The Shaykh: Okay, it is weak!
The questioner: *al-Raghib*
4 /11
4 /11The Shaykh: Okay, *Da'if al-Targhib*, number: 11.
The questioner: No, Part Four, Volume Four, number: 11, *al-Ta'liq al-Raghib*, page: 11, excuse me.
The Shaykh: So it is not *Da'if al-Targhib*!
The questioner: No, no, *al-Ta'liq al-Raghib*.
The Shaykh: *al-Ta'liq al-Raghib*!
The questioner: *Da'if al-Targhib* has not yet been seen by the eyes, O our Shaykh!
The Shaykh: Not yet, yes, *al-Ta'liq al-Raghib*, number: 11, Part?
The questioner: No, Part Four, page: 11.
The Shaykh: Ah, this is *al-Ta'liq al-Raghib*, okay, what else?
The questioner: Page: 11.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: This is the text you wrote, of course, so I do not know if you mentioned any of this or not, so I say I have nothing, O our Shaykh.
The Shaykh: Go ahead.
The questioner: The first corroboration is in *al-Samt* by Ibn Abi al-Dunya, number:
110
110The Shaykh: Number:
110
110The questioner: From Ka'b ibn Ujrah.
The Shaykh: Okay, what else?
The questioner: And the second corroboration is in Abu Ya'la, from Abu Hurayrah:
6646
6646The Shaykh: Six thousand and six hundred?
The questioner: And forty-six, of course, both are weak in chain.
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner: So this is what is before you.
The Shaykh : May Allah reward you with good.
The questioner: May Allah preserve you, O our Shaykh.
The Shaykh : May Allah honor you.
The questioner: And you as well, O my professor.
The Shaykh : Welcome.
The questioner : Peace be upon you, and Allah’s mercy and blessings.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.