What is the reason for including the jurists' rulings on obligatory matters, given that it does not contain a request to act or a request to refrain?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : ... including the permissible in the jurists' rulings on obligatory matters, even though it does not contain a request to act or a request to refrain?
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Yes, as defined by the jurists, meaning...
The Shaykh : By Allah, I do not know, because it is required of you not to forbid what Allah (Mighty and Majestic) has made permissible. So, this seems to be the only answer, as it is mentioned in some hadiths, even though it is not authentic in terms of its chain of narration. With this consideration, the question can be answered.
The questioner : May Allah reward you with good.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Yes, as defined by the jurists, meaning...
The Shaykh : By Allah, I do not know, because it is required of you not to forbid what Allah (Mighty and Majestic) has made permissible. So, this seems to be the only answer, as it is mentioned in some hadiths, even though it is not authentic in terms of its chain of narration
Forbidding the lawful is like permitting the forbidden
محرِّم الحلال كمحلِّل الحرامThe questioner : May Allah reward you with good.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.