If we say "O slave," we do not know if perhaps he is calling a slave who is not attached to anyone?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : I mean, you are saying: If we say "O slave," we do not know if perhaps he is calling a slave who is not attached to anyone?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Is that right?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : This is correct and has a basis, but if I know that I am calling my slave, that I am calling the slave who is attached to me, then this alif is a deleted yaa due to the meeting of two static letters. However, if it is indefinite, it was mentioned at the beginning of the author's speech that he says the indefinite is not called out to. If you say "O slave," meaning just a slave, the calling out is not valid at all, because he says, "Nor is the indefinite called out to, nor the ambiguous." And the indefinite is not called out to. Yes?
The student: But he knows.
The Shaykh : Yes? He knows...
The questioner : It is permissible to say "O my slave," "O slave."
The Shaykh : The yaa is deleted for ease of pronunciation.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : It is built on a presumed dammah on its end, and its appearance was prevented by the occupation of the place with the movement of waiting, according to the language of those who wait, because it will come to us from the author's words, so wait, that it is permissible in two languages regarding the lightened word: is its end considered like the end of a non-lightened word, or is its end considered as lightened, with something deleted from it.
The student: Jādd al-Ḥaqq.
The Shaykh : Yes?
The student: Does Jādd al-Ḥaqq get lightened?
The Shaykh : I do not know, by Allah.
The student: It is a name.
The Shaykh : Are we asking you now?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Is that right?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : This is correct and has a basis, but if I know that I am calling my slave, that I am calling the slave who is attached to me, then this alif is a deleted yaa due to the meeting of two static letters. However, if it is indefinite, it was mentioned at the beginning of the author's speech that he says the indefinite is not called out to. If you say "O slave," meaning just a slave, the calling out is not valid at all, because he says, "Nor is the indefinite called out to, nor the ambiguous." And the indefinite is not called out to. Yes?
The student: But he knows.
The Shaykh : Yes? He knows...
The questioner : It is permissible to say "O my slave," "O slave."
The Shaykh : The yaa is deleted for ease of pronunciation.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : It is built on a presumed dammah on its end, and its appearance was prevented by the occupation of the place with the movement of waiting, according to the language of those who wait, because it will come to us from the author's words, so wait, that it is permissible in two languages regarding the lightened word: is its end considered like the end of a non-lightened word, or is its end considered as lightened, with something deleted from it.
The student: Jādd al-Ḥaqq.
The Shaykh : Yes?
The student: Does Jādd al-Ḥaqq get lightened?
The Shaykh : I do not know, by Allah.
The student: It is a name.
The Shaykh : Are we asking you now?