Reading from Ibn Aqil’s commentary (may Allah have mercy on him), with the Shaykh’s annotations: " .
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The reader: "And it is not connected except to established nouns and verbs, as for particles".
The Shaykh : What did we say about verbs?
The student: Not static.
The Shaykh : Not static.
The student: And static ones?
The Shaykh : Huh?
The questioner : Static ones?
The Shaykh : He said: "And it is not connected except to established nouns and verbs"
The student: Established?
The Shaykh : Not static, yes.
The reader: "As for particles and their like, they have no connection to the science of morphology
And there is nothing less than a triliteral that is seen *** as capable of morphological derivation, except for what has been altered
This means that neither nouns nor verbs consisting of a single letter or two letters are capable of morphological derivation, unless a letter has been omitted from them. The minimum number of letters upon which established nouns and verbs are built is three. However, some may undergo reduction, such as *yad* (hand), *qal* (few), *wa-ma Allah* (and Allah), and *wa-q Zayd* (and Zayd)".
The Shaykh :"And *wa-q Zayd*".
The reader: "And *wa-q Zayd*"
The Shaykh : *Q Zayd*, what is *wa-q Zayd*?
The student: From *waqayah* (protection).
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : *Wa-ma Allah*, based on the assumption that its original form is *Yamin Allah* (the oath of Allah).
The questioner : With the dammah or the fathah?
The Shaykh : No, with the fathah, *wa-ma Allah*.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : We have *wa-mam Allah*, perhaps *wa-ma Allah* is from *ayman* (oath), *ayman Allah* (the oath of Allah).
The Shaykh : What did we say about verbs?
The student: Not static.
The Shaykh : Not static.
The student: And static ones?
The Shaykh : Huh?
The questioner : Static ones?
The Shaykh : He said: "And it is not connected except to established nouns and verbs"
The student: Established?
The Shaykh : Not static, yes.
The reader: "As for particles and their like, they have no connection to the science of morphology
And there is nothing less than a triliteral that is seen *** as capable of morphological derivation, except for what has been altered
This means that neither nouns nor verbs consisting of a single letter or two letters are capable of morphological derivation, unless a letter has been omitted from them. The minimum number of letters upon which established nouns and verbs are built is three. However, some may undergo reduction, such as *yad* (hand), *qal* (few), *wa-ma Allah* (and Allah), and *wa-q Zayd* (and Zayd)".
The Shaykh :"And *wa-q Zayd*".
The reader: "And *wa-q Zayd*"
The Shaykh : *Q Zayd*, what is *wa-q Zayd*?
The student: From *waqayah* (protection).
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : *Wa-ma Allah*, based on the assumption that its original form is *Yamin Allah* (the oath of Allah).
The questioner : With the dammah or the fathah?
The Shaykh : No, with the fathah, *wa-ma Allah*.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : We have *wa-mam Allah*, perhaps *wa-ma Allah* is from *ayman* (oath), *ayman Allah* (the oath of Allah).