It is not befitting to mention anomalous opinions that are not acted upon, so that the student of knowledge is not confused while the Shaykh comments on excerpts from the book *Dhawa'if*
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The reader: Well, there is another question that came in regarding the Hanafis in the principles of jurisprudence, that they prioritized analogical reasoning over explicit texts, as in the case of touching the private parts?
The Shaykh : It appears that the author is a Hanafi.
The reader: No, the author is a man of good, and he is a Salafi; he has refutations, but he distinguishes between the opinions.
The Shaykh : Refutations of them?
The reader: Refutations of them, yes.
The Shaykh : But the dead do not validate... I mean, there is no need to cite such opinions and confuse the students of knowledge and their thoughts, and then to refute them.
The reader: Presenting the essence.
The Shaykh : Yes, in which year is this?
The reader: This is a doctor at the Islamic University, 'Abd al-'Aziz al-'Abd al-Latif.
The Shaykh : No problem, but in which year is this course taught?
The reader: I do not know; I took this from the library and photographed it.
The Shaykh : It appears that the author is a Hanafi.
The reader: No, the author is a man of good, and he is a Salafi; he has refutations, but he distinguishes between the opinions.
The Shaykh : Refutations of them?
The reader: Refutations of them, yes.
The Shaykh : But the dead do not validate... I mean, there is no need to cite such opinions and confuse the students of knowledge and their thoughts, and then to refute them.
The reader: Presenting the essence.
The Shaykh : Yes, in which year is this?
The reader: This is a doctor at the Islamic University, 'Abd al-'Aziz al-'Abd al-Latif.
The Shaykh : No problem, but in which year is this course taught?
The reader: I do not know; I took this from the library and photographed it.