Aisha's hadith: "And whoever claims that Muhammad concealed something he was commanded to convey—by the implication of the opposite, if he was not commanded to convey it, is it permissible for the Messenger to conceal it?"
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Aisha's hadith Jami` at-Tirmidhi 3068Sahih (Darussalam) By the implication of the opposite, if he was not commanded to convey it, is it permissible for the Messenger to conceal it?
The Shaykh : First, the implication of the opposite is not always and forever used as evidence. Second, it can be said that what has no relation to the Shari'ah, which he did not convey, can be said to be so, because of his statement in the previous verse:[Al-Ma'idah 5:67].
And whoever claimed that Muhammad hid anything that Allah revealed to him
ومن زعم أن محمدا كتم شيئا امر بتبليغهThe Shaykh : First, the implication of the opposite is not always and forever used as evidence. Second, it can be said that what has no relation to the Shari'ah, which he did not convey, can be said to be so, because of his statement in the previous verse: