By the implication of the opposite of Aisha's hadith: (And whoever claims that Muhammad concealed something he was commanded to convey)
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Aisha's hadith: Jami` at-Tirmidhi 3068Sahih (Darussalam), so by the implication of the opposite, if he was not commanded to convey it, is it permissible for the Messenger to conceal?
The Shaykh : First: the implication of the opposite is not always and forever used as evidence. Second: it is possible to say that what is not related to the Shari'ah is what he did not convey; it is possible to say this; because his statement in the previous verse:[Al-Ma'idah 5:67].
And whoever claimed that Muhammad hid anything that Allah revealed to him
ومن زعم أن محمدًا كتم شيئًا أمر بتبليغهThe Shaykh : First: the implication of the opposite is not always and forever used as evidence. Second: it is possible to say that what is not related to the Shari'ah is what he did not convey; it is possible to say this; because his statement in the previous verse:
O Messenger, announce that which has been revealed to you from your Lord, and if you do not, then you have not conveyed His message
يا أيها الرسول بلغ ما أنزل إليك من ربك وإن لم تفعل فما بلغت رسالته
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.