Ruling on the phrase: (La 'amraka)
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Ruling on the phrase: (La 'amraka)]
Your Eminence, what is the ruling on swearing by this word: La 'amraka, which we hear often in verses of poetry, with an explanation of the evidence, and some of them said it is permissible on the grounds that it was used among the Salaf and they did not disapprove of it?
As for if it is from Allah, it is permissible,And it is in the Qur'an: [Al-Hijr: 72] , As for if it is from a created being to a created being, it is not the oath about which the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) said: (Whoever swears by other than Allah has committed disbelief or associated partners with Allah) because the oath has a specific form; it begins with the letter waw, or ba, or ta, whereas La 'amraka is not an explicit oath,And therefore it came in the hadith: (La 'amri) , and it also came in the athar from the Companions that they used to say: (La 'amri) As for (La 'amraka), I do not recall now that it was transmitted from the Salaf, neither in speech nor in approval, but (La 'amri) was transmitted, and I think there is no difference between (La 'amri) and (La 'amraka), because they are all the life of a created human being.
Your Eminence, what is the ruling on swearing by this word: La 'amraka, which we hear often in verses of poetry, with an explanation of the evidence, and some of them said it is permissible on the grounds that it was used among the Salaf and they did not disapprove of it?
As for if it is from Allah, it is permissible,And it is in the Qur'an:
