The ruling on one who passes the miqat and then enters the state of ihram, the ruling on a child who entered ihram but did not complete his 'Umrah, and the ruling on a woman in post-natal bleeding who entered ihram from the place where she became pure

A young man traveled from al-Qassim intending to perform 'Umrah via al-Madinah, accompanied by his wife, who was in her post-natal waiting period.And she stipulated, saying: If she became pure—being in her final days—I would perform the 'Umrah. He did not enter the state of ihram except from Jeddah, and with him was a small boy who wore the ihram garments but did not perform the 'Umrah; the boy was six years old. He says: So what is required of me?
As for the boy, he owes nothing; because the pen has been lifted from the child. So if he enters the state of ihram and then later gets tired of the ihram and exits it, there is no blame on him.
As for him, he has contradicted the command of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) to enter the state of ihram from the miqat; for the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) commanded that whoever intends Hajj or 'Umrah should enter the state of ihram from the miqat. The man passed the miqat and did not enter the state of ihram except in Jeddah, so he owes, according to the scholars, a fidyah (ransom payment) to be slaughtered in Makkah and distributed to the poor; because he left an obligatory act.
As for the wife, she owes nothing as long as she fears that she will not become pure except late.And she said: If she becomes pure, she enters the state of ihram; otherwise, she does not enter the state of ihram. There is no blame on her for entering the state of ihram from the place where she became pure.