The ruling on holding a feast to catch out those who make mistakes
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
There is a custom that exists, which is holding a feast to catch out those who make mistakes, in one of the gatherings—for example—When a mistake is made by one of the people, it is said, for example: you have a right, and when a dispute occurs, they resort to a third party to adjudicate the case, and it is said: Do I have a right or not? What is the ruling in this?
These are two questions, may Allah reward you. You have combined them into one question, and there is no blessing in trickery in knowledge.
As for the first: So I see that this is consuming wealth by right.Meaning: I hear that if he says: O Muhammad, and his name is Abdullah,He said: you have a right, by what? Forgetfulness happens to every person,And perhaps the same person who said: O Abdullah, for the one whose name is Muhammad and whose name is Abdullah, perhaps your intention here is to ensure that you have a right and to laugh at him. I see that this is consuming wealth by right. What happened? So turning away from it is undoubtedly safer for the conscience and more cautious.
As for when two people dispute and then agree that a person should reconcile between them, and he sees that one of them is wrong and that he will not allow his companion to do anything but hold a feast, I hope there is no harm in that,On the condition: provided that this is not done as a compulsion, or as a substitute for the judgment of Allah, as is found in some tribes; because this is forbidden and not permissible.
These are two questions, may Allah reward you. You have combined them into one question, and there is no blessing in trickery in knowledge.
As for the first: So I see that this is consuming wealth by right.Meaning: I hear that if he says: O Muhammad, and his name is Abdullah,He said: you have a right, by what? Forgetfulness happens to every person,And perhaps the same person who said: O Abdullah, for the one whose name is Muhammad and whose name is Abdullah, perhaps your intention here is to ensure that you have a right and to laugh at him. I see that this is consuming wealth by right. What happened? So turning away from it is undoubtedly safer for the conscience and more cautious.
As for when two people dispute and then agree that a person should reconcile between them, and he sees that one of them is wrong and that he will not allow his companion to do anything but hold a feast, I hope there is no harm in that,On the condition: provided that this is not done as a compulsion, or as a substitute for the judgment of Allah, as is found in some tribes; because this is forbidden and not permissible.