Discussion on the situation in Afghanistan after the departure of the heads.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Now, what are the events and news regarding Afghanistan... the journals of religion.
The Shaykh : There are sad news, meaning the division among them is increasing. There is no doubt that the division is apparent, and in addition to the aspect he pointed out, that the Americans were supplying them with weapons. This was an initial mistake. The Afghans should not have accepted the help of a state like America, because this help—this is something they must look at as having consequences. And that is what happened. But one does not know the circumstances of the people; perhaps they were forced. Where was one to think?
The questioner : One of the young men who struggled there, may Allah have mercy on him, Abdullah al-Azzam, said that he was biased against the Salafis. There was a Salafi group there that was struggling. He was biased toward the Muslim Brotherhood and prevented aid from reaching the Salafi mujahideen.
The Shaykh : This, my brother, is one of the results of partisanship.
The questioner : This man was a mujahid. What did he sacrifice his self for? And yet he had bias toward the madhhab or the political creed they have.
Another questioner : They say that the Pakistani intelligence... that this Benazir is a communist. And so, meaning...
Al-Halabi : I heard that she is Qadiani. I heard, I do not know, the news was said that she is Qadiani. And the value of Islam for her is merely a cover, but as for belief, she is Qadiani.
The Shaykh : There is no power nor strength except by Allah.
The questioner : Her father was far from Islam.
Al-Halabi : A communist.
The questioner : No, not a communist...
Al-Halabi : He had atheistic ideas or something like that, and communism, or not exactly like that.
The questioner : It does not concern me.
The Shaykh : There are sad news, meaning the division among them is increasing. There is no doubt that the division is apparent, and in addition to the aspect he pointed out, that the Americans were supplying them with weapons. This was an initial mistake. The Afghans should not have accepted the help of a state like America, because this help—this is something they must look at as having consequences. And that is what happened. But one does not know the circumstances of the people; perhaps they were forced. Where was one to think?
The questioner : One of the young men who struggled there, may Allah have mercy on him, Abdullah al-Azzam, said that he was biased against the Salafis. There was a Salafi group there that was struggling. He was biased toward the Muslim Brotherhood and prevented aid from reaching the Salafi mujahideen.
The Shaykh : This, my brother, is one of the results of partisanship.
The questioner : This man was a mujahid. What did he sacrifice his self for? And yet he had bias toward the madhhab or the political creed they have.
Another questioner : They say that the Pakistani intelligence... that this Benazir is a communist. And so, meaning...
Al-Halabi : I heard that she is Qadiani. I heard, I do not know, the news was said that she is Qadiani. And the value of Islam for her is merely a cover, but as for belief, she is Qadiani.
The Shaykh : There is no power nor strength except by Allah.
The questioner : Her father was far from Islam.
Al-Halabi : A communist.
The questioner : No, not a communist...
Al-Halabi : He had atheistic ideas or something like that, and communism, or not exactly like that.
The questioner : It does not concern me.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.