Discussion on the correct pronunciation of the word *ta'd* in the hadith: “May Allah increase you in diligence and not *ta'd*.”
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Shaykh, if my memory is not failing me, it seems that in *Sahih al-Jami'* you pronounce the word Sunan Abi Dawud 683Sahih (Al-Albani) like this.
The Shaykh : I do not know. Is it *wa la ta'id* or what?
The questioner : *Wa la ta'id*.
The Shaykh : What does *wa la ta'id* mean?
The questioner : You pronounce it *wa la ta'ud*.
The Shaykh : There are two narrations: either *la ta'ud* or *la ta'ud*.
The questioner : I think you pronounced it *wa la ta'ud* in *Sahih al-Jami'*.
The Shaykh : Yes, you are saying *wa la ta'id*.
Al-Halabi : Shaykh, in *al-Silsilah* you conducted an extensive research, Shaykh, and you preferred *ta'd* to mean haste. That is what you preferred.
The Shaykh : In any case, the diacritical marks in *al-Jami' al-Saghir* and the attribution are not my work; that is the work of al-Suyuti. My work, and this must be known by students of knowledge, is first to verify and weaken, placing the authentic in one book and the weak in another. Second, to mention the source of the verification and weakening. I may add some sources after mentioning the source of verification, indicating who traced the hadith to sources other than those al-Suyuti attributed it to. As for al-Suyuti's book, it remains as it is. Sometimes circumstances or situations arise that lead me to add some comments, but this is not the principle of my project. This project is to divide the book into authentic and weak, and that is all. The diacritical marks of the book and the symbols, such as kha, mīm, dāl, etc., are not from me; they are from al-Suyuti.
The Shaykh : Well, in another book, Ahmad, because he swept the field entirely, and naturally, when there is no other book, he advances, so the field remains for him at his expense.
May Allah increase your eagerness! But do not do it again.
زادك الله حرصا ولا تُعِدThe Shaykh : I do not know. Is it *wa la ta'id* or what?
The questioner : *Wa la ta'id*.
The Shaykh : What does *wa la ta'id* mean?
The questioner : You pronounce it *wa la ta'ud*.
The Shaykh : There are two narrations: either *la ta'ud* or *la ta'ud*.
The questioner : I think you pronounced it *wa la ta'ud* in *Sahih al-Jami'*.
The Shaykh : Yes, you are saying *wa la ta'id*.
Al-Halabi : Shaykh, in *al-Silsilah* you conducted an extensive research, Shaykh, and you preferred *ta'd* to mean haste. That is what you preferred.
The Shaykh : In any case, the diacritical marks in *al-Jami' al-Saghir* and the attribution are not my work; that is the work of al-Suyuti. My work, and this must be known by students of knowledge, is first to verify and weaken, placing the authentic in one book and the weak in another. Second, to mention the source of the verification and weakening. I may add some sources after mentioning the source of verification, indicating who traced the hadith to sources other than those al-Suyuti attributed it to. As for al-Suyuti's book, it remains as it is. Sometimes circumstances or situations arise that lead me to add some comments, but this is not the principle of my project. This project is to divide the book into authentic and weak, and that is all. The diacritical marks of the book and the symbols, such as kha, mīm, dāl, etc., are not from me; they are from al-Suyuti.
The Shaykh : Well, in another book, Ahmad, because he swept the field entirely, and naturally, when there is no other book, he advances, so the field remains for him at his expense.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.