What is the ruling on one who accuses some of the wives of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) of zina?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : What is the ruling on one who accuses one of the wives of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) of zina?
The Shaykh : You are correct, you are Iraqi.
The questioner : Hehe.
The Shaykh : But we understood that you are Iraqi, so we no longer need new proofs.
The questioner : Hehe.
The Shaykh : Huh, my brother, this is added to the previous question which accuses a wife of the Prophet (peace be upon him) of zina, especially when the Qur'an has testified to her chastity and protection. There is no doubt that this is disbelief. So we return and say: it is obligatory to establish the proof against him. After establishing the proof against him, either he submits to the proof or he denies it. If he submits, praise be to Allah. If he denies it, he is a disbeliever. But what happened after that? You are the one who issued this declaration of disbelief. You are now judged as a disbeliever in his entirety, and the calamity that occurred there, which shook the entire Islamic world, was not except by the ruling of what? Disbelief? Are these details of disbelief? I say: leave them. Try to protect yourselves with the correct creed. If we say this is disbelief and this is disbelief, then what about the ruling on the Ba'ath Party's principles, whether in Iraq or in Syria? Is it not disbelief? Or is the earth inhabited?
The questioner : Hehe.
The Shaykh : Huh, I say: ask questions other than these, because you know what...
The questioner : The rule.
The Shaykh : The rule, may Allah bless you, yes.
The Shaykh : You are correct, you are Iraqi.
The questioner : Hehe.
The Shaykh : But we understood that you are Iraqi, so we no longer need new proofs.
The questioner : Hehe.
The Shaykh : Huh, my brother, this is added to the previous question which accuses a wife of the Prophet (peace be upon him) of zina, especially when the Qur'an has testified to her chastity and protection. There is no doubt that this is disbelief. So we return and say: it is obligatory to establish the proof against him. After establishing the proof against him, either he submits to the proof or he denies it. If he submits, praise be to Allah. If he denies it, he is a disbeliever. But what happened after that? You are the one who issued this declaration of disbelief. You are now judged as a disbeliever in his entirety, and the calamity that occurred there, which shook the entire Islamic world, was not except by the ruling of what? Disbelief? Are these details of disbelief? I say: leave them. Try to protect yourselves with the correct creed. If we say this is disbelief and this is disbelief, then what about the ruling on the Ba'ath Party's principles, whether in Iraq or in Syria? Is it not disbelief? Or is the earth inhabited?
The questioner : Hehe.
The Shaykh : Huh, I say: ask questions other than these, because you know what...
The questioner : The rule.
The Shaykh : The rule, may Allah bless you, yes.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.