Is it permissible to warn against al-Ghazali?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : You find some of them having deviation...
The Shaykh : Do they have it?
The questioner : They have deviation, for example al-Ghazali. Is it permissible to warn people against these people?
The Shaykh : Yes, it is permissible, but the wording must be such that people do not understand that there is hatred and grudges or the like. That is, with gentleness and compassion, and supplication to our Lord, Mighty and Majestic, that He guide him, and this is necessary.
Al-Halabi : ... the chain, because of the chain...The Shaykh : May Allah reward him with good. When he was asked about this hadith two days ago, he said, "From memory, perhaps it contains Abu Ishaq, or Abu Ishaq, as I recall." Now, in the book, the hadith contains Abu Ishaq, explicitly narrating it, but the defect of Abu Ishaq's confusion in the narration of Zuhayr from him remains. Then this addition is unique to Abu Ishaq as a result of his confusion. Therefore, the hadith is narrated through other routes without this addition. And our Shaykh has cited the hadith in al-Silsilah al-Da'ifah for this addition, is that not so, Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Yes, exactly.
Another questioner : Read the hadith.
Al-Halabi : The hadith is cited by al-Bukhari (may Allah have mercy on him) in the Book of Hajj, in the chapter "Whoever called to prayer and gave the second call for each of them," meaning combining the two prayers. Then he said: "Omar ibn Khalid narrated to us, Zuhayr narrated to us, Abu Ishaq narrated to us, he said: I heard Abd al-Rahman ibn Yazid say:Sunan al-Bayhaqi 4:840 to the end of it." Here, the mention of the two rak'ahs is the point to which our Shaykh is referring.
Abu Layla : Is there a comment on it, Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Yes, O thirsty one.
The Shaykh : Do they have it?
The questioner : They have deviation, for example al-Ghazali. Is it permissible to warn people against these people?
The Shaykh : Yes, it is permissible, but the wording must be such that people do not understand that there is hatred and grudges or the like. That is, with gentleness and compassion, and supplication to our Lord, Mighty and Majestic, that He guide him, and this is necessary.
Al-Halabi : ... the chain, because of the chain...The Shaykh : May Allah reward him with good. When he was asked about this hadith two days ago, he said, "From memory, perhaps it contains Abu Ishaq, or Abu Ishaq, as I recall." Now, in the book, the hadith contains Abu Ishaq, explicitly narrating it, but the defect of Abu Ishaq's confusion in the narration of Zuhayr from him remains. Then this addition is unique to Abu Ishaq as a result of his confusion. Therefore, the hadith is narrated through other routes without this addition. And our Shaykh has cited the hadith in al-Silsilah al-Da'ifah for this addition, is that not so, Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Yes, exactly.
Another questioner : Read the hadith.
Al-Halabi : The hadith is cited by al-Bukhari (may Allah have mercy on him) in the Book of Hajj, in the chapter "Whoever called to prayer and gave the second call for each of them," meaning combining the two prayers. Then he said: "Omar ibn Khalid narrated to us, Zuhayr narrated to us, Abu Ishaq narrated to us, he said: I heard Abd al-Rahman ibn Yazid say:
Abd Allah (may Allah be pleased with him) performed Hajj, and we came to Muzdalifah when the call for 'Isha' was made, or close to that time. He ordered a man to call to prayer and give the second call, then he prayed Maghrib, and then he prayed two rak'ahs after it. Then he called for his dinner and ate.
حجّ عبد الله رضي الله عنه فأتينا المزدلفة حين الأذان بالعتمة أو قريبا من ذلك فأمر رجلا فأذّن و أقام ثم صلّى المغرب و صلّى بعدها ركعتين ثمّ دعا بعشائه فتعشّىAbu Layla : Is there a comment on it, Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Yes, O thirsty one.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.