Is it possible for a narrator who is abandoned or a liar to appear in the chain of a hadith that is being traced to its sources as authentic?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : In the book *Irwaa' al-Ghalil*, I saw that in some places you mentioned a hadith of a man, meaning it appears that he is abandoned or a liar. You said, "And we have known the authenticity of his hadith," and you mentioned it as a corroborating narration. Is it possible, if we are certain of the authenticity of a hadith through a narration in another place, to mention the abandoned or lying narrator in the verification as well, in the context of the hadith?
The Shaykh : What do you mean? Do you mean tracing his hadith to its sources?
The questioner : Yes, we trace his hadith to its sources and say, "Even though he is a liar, his hadith is authentic."
The Shaykh : And what prevents this? If the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) says in the authentic hadith, then no matter what his status is, he is better than that lying devil!
The questioner : What Allah willed.
The Shaykh : What do you mean? Do you mean tracing his hadith to its sources?
The questioner : Yes, we trace his hadith to its sources and say, "Even though he is a liar, his hadith is authentic."
The Shaykh : And what prevents this? If the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) says in the authentic hadith
He has told you the truth, and he is a liar
صدقك وهو كذوبThe questioner : What Allah willed.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.
