Is the stronger position regarding Jabir al-Juhfi that he is abandoned and not cited as evidence? And is al-Harith al-A'war the same?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Regarding Jabir al-Juhfi, is the stronger position in his case that he is abandoned and not cited as evidence? I have noticed in some places that you cite him as evidence, and in other places that you reject him?
The Shaykh : In the hadith, regardless of his reliability, I was not convinced by the accusation of lying against him; rather, he is weak. We may cite him as evidence for what was mentioned previously in some...
The questioner : He is considered abandoned if his denunciation becomes clear, but the original ruling regarding him is that he is cited as evidence.
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The questioner : What Allah willed, and so is al-Harith al-A'war.
The Shaykh : So is al-Harith, yes.
The questioner : What Allah willed, may Allah bless you.
The Shaykh : In the hadith, regardless of his reliability, I was not convinced by the accusation of lying against him; rather, he is weak. We may cite him as evidence for what was mentioned previously in some...
The questioner : He is considered abandoned if his denunciation becomes clear, but the original ruling regarding him is that he is cited as evidence.
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed.
The questioner : What Allah willed, and so is al-Harith al-A'war.
The Shaykh : So is al-Harith, yes.
The questioner : What Allah willed, may Allah bless you.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.