Is the statement of al-Hafiz that Ibn Jurayj is little in tadlis regarding Nafi', and that he heard much from him, is his statement correct?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Here is the phrase of our Shaykh in al-Fath, in the fourth volume, in the Book of Sales, in the chapter on buying something for another without his permission and the other accepts it. The hadith is narrated through the route of Ibn Jurayj, who said: "Musa ibn 'Uqbah informed us from Nafi'." Al-Hafiz said: "In it is the insertion of an intermediary between Ibn Jurayj and Nafi'." Ibn Jurayj and Nafi', because Ibn Jurayj said: "Musa ibn 'Uqbah informed us from Nafi'."
The Shaykh : Okay.
The questioner : Al-Hafiz said: "In it is the insertion of an intermediary between Ibn Jurayj and Nafi'." And Ibn Jurayj had heard much from Nafi', so in it is an indication of the little tadlis of Ibn Jurayj regarding Nafi'.
The Shaykh : That the littleness is not taken from this little amount, but rather it means that he may not commit tadlis when he narrates from his Shaykh from whom he heard. As for the littleness, from where is it taken?
The questioner : He intends to argue by the fact that he narrated much from him, and yet he narrates from him through an intermediary. This indicates that it was possible for him to commit tadlis and elevate the chain by dropping the intermediary. This indicates that he is little in tadlis regarding him.
The Shaykh : Yes, but no one says that he always commits tadlis or that he often commits tadlis. He used to commit tadlis sometimes. As for the littleness to the extent that we place him in the first rank of the ranks of those who commit tadlis, or the second rank, and I do not think that al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar placed him in this rank which indicates his deduction here of the little tadlis of Ibn Jurayj. Do you remember?
The questioner : He mentioned him in the ranks from which one should be cautious, but perhaps specifically regarding Nafi' he is little. Perhaps this is from the words of al-Hafiz specifically regarding Nafi'.
The Shaykh : Yes, but his claim here is specifically regarding Nafi'.
The questioner : Yes, may Allah preserve you. Yes, he said: "In it is an indication of the little tadlis of Ibn Jurayj." Regarding the word "Ibn Jurayj."
The Shaykh : No.
The questioner : But his statement is not restricted.
The Shaykh : It is not restricted.
The Shaykh : Okay.
The questioner : Al-Hafiz said: "In it is the insertion of an intermediary between Ibn Jurayj and Nafi'." And Ibn Jurayj had heard much from Nafi', so in it is an indication of the little tadlis of Ibn Jurayj regarding Nafi'.
The Shaykh : That the littleness is not taken from this little amount, but rather it means that he may not commit tadlis when he narrates from his Shaykh from whom he heard. As for the littleness, from where is it taken?
The questioner : He intends to argue by the fact that he narrated much from him, and yet he narrates from him through an intermediary. This indicates that it was possible for him to commit tadlis and elevate the chain by dropping the intermediary. This indicates that he is little in tadlis regarding him.
The Shaykh : Yes, but no one says that he always commits tadlis or that he often commits tadlis. He used to commit tadlis sometimes. As for the littleness to the extent that we place him in the first rank of the ranks of those who commit tadlis, or the second rank, and I do not think that al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar placed him in this rank which indicates his deduction here of the little tadlis of Ibn Jurayj. Do you remember?
The questioner : He mentioned him in the ranks from which one should be cautious, but perhaps specifically regarding Nafi' he is little. Perhaps this is from the words of al-Hafiz specifically regarding Nafi'.
The Shaykh : Yes, but his claim here is specifically regarding Nafi'.
The questioner : Yes, may Allah preserve you. Yes, he said: "In it is an indication of the little tadlis of Ibn Jurayj." Regarding the word "Ibn Jurayj."
The Shaykh : No.
The questioner : But his statement is not restricted.
The Shaykh : It is not restricted.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.