Discussion of stocks.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : ... five thousand, and his profit at the end of the year is one thousand, for example. Each of the three takes one thousand. As for the one who bought, he takes one thousand and an extra. Is that what you mean?
The questioner : They take an extra, but only according to the fact that he bought.
The Shaykh : My brother, what do we have now regarding the distribution? The important thing is that the one thousand: he takes it just as his two other partners take it, and then he takes an extra on top of that. He takes this extra in exchange for having bought from this company. Is that so?
The questioner : Yes
The Shaykh : ... Are you done here?
The questioner : Yes
The Shaykh : My question was this: what I understood from you was my question: why did you impose this extra on this partner who bought from the same company? Why did you impose this?
The questioner : Because he is a member.
The Shaykh : And those are members.
The questioner : It is not a condition.
The Shaykh : So it is not because he is a member; this is an incomplete cause. They are all partners. You want to say because he bought.
The questioner : Because he is a member and bought. What if he were not a member and bought?
The Shaykh : We are talking about three. May Allah guide you and me. You are talking about the three partners. You do not say "what if he were not a member," because that is understood, because the discussion is about the three partners. So each of them takes a certain share based on equality, if the value of the subscription or the stock is unified, correct?
The questioner : Yes
The Shaykh : But this one who bought from the company is given an extra on top of the one thousand, correct?
The questioner : Yes
The Shaykh : Okay, my question is: why is this extra not given to him? Did you understand finally? Because he bought from the same company, he helps the company in two ways. The first aspect is his contribution. The first aspect is buying from it. So instead of benefiting a foreign company, he benefits the company in which he is a partner. Is that right? Is there anything else?
The questioner : You asked us about songs... is it lawful or forbidden?
The Shaykh : Yes, yes. And upon you be peace, and Allah's mercy and blessings.
The questioner : They take an extra, but only according to the fact that he bought.
The Shaykh : My brother, what do we have now regarding the distribution? The important thing is that the one thousand: he takes it just as his two other partners take it, and then he takes an extra on top of that. He takes this extra in exchange for having bought from this company. Is that so?
The questioner : Yes
The Shaykh : ... Are you done here?
The questioner : Yes
The Shaykh : My question was this: what I understood from you was my question: why did you impose this extra on this partner who bought from the same company? Why did you impose this?
The questioner : Because he is a member.
The Shaykh : And those are members.
The questioner : It is not a condition.
The Shaykh : So it is not because he is a member; this is an incomplete cause. They are all partners. You want to say because he bought.
The questioner : Because he is a member and bought. What if he were not a member and bought?
The Shaykh : We are talking about three. May Allah guide you and me. You are talking about the three partners. You do not say "what if he were not a member," because that is understood, because the discussion is about the three partners. So each of them takes a certain share based on equality, if the value of the subscription or the stock is unified, correct?
The questioner : Yes
The Shaykh : But this one who bought from the company is given an extra on top of the one thousand, correct?
The questioner : Yes
The Shaykh : Okay, my question is: why is this extra not given to him? Did you understand finally? Because he bought from the same company, he helps the company in two ways. The first aspect is his contribution. The first aspect is buying from it. So instead of benefiting a foreign company, he benefits the company in which he is a partner. Is that right? Is there anything else?
The questioner : You asked us about songs... is it lawful or forbidden?
The Shaykh : Yes, yes. And upon you be peace, and Allah's mercy and blessings.