This morning I mentioned... al-Hafiz graded it as hasan (may Allah be pleased with him), but I mean, we had a query about it, and I hope it will not take up the lesson time.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : This morning I mentioned... al-Hafiz graded it as hasan (may Allah be pleased with him), but I mean, we had a query about it, and I hope it will not take up the lesson time. It is that some scholars, then the scholars of al-jarh wa al-ta'dil in the first volume, mentioned that there are a few hadiths established from al-Hasan ibn Samurah, and if they came with the wording "I was told" (qaddama), they mentioned among them the hadith of the 'aqiqah. I have not come across this, and I do not know the truth of this statement?
The Shaykh : This is correct. It is mentioned in Sahih al-Bukhari, the hadith of the 'aqiqah, as an indication in Sahih al-Bukhari that it is from what he heard from Samurah. But in al-Bukhari, the hadith of the 'aqiqah, as for what is the hadith of the 'aqiqah, it is taken from the Sunan. This is correct, and this does not contradict what I mentioned, because I said that if he explicitly states "I was told" (tahdid), it is a proof. As for what you are asking about, it is correct and accepted. Anyone else?
The Shaykh : This is correct. It is mentioned in Sahih al-Bukhari, the hadith of the 'aqiqah, as an indication in Sahih al-Bukhari that it is from what he heard from Samurah. But in al-Bukhari, the hadith of the 'aqiqah, as for what is the hadith of the 'aqiqah, it is taken from the Sunan. This is correct, and this does not contradict what I mentioned, because I said that if he explicitly states "I was told" (tahdid), it is a proof. As for what you are asking about, it is correct and accepted. Anyone else?