What is the jurisprudential understanding of the hadith of Ibn 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with them both) that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: (Misfortune is in a woman, a house, and a horse)?

The questioner : The hadith of Ibn 'Umar is in "al-Sahihayn" (the two authentic collections). The Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) said: ; so what is the jurisprudential understanding of this hadith?

The Shaykh : This hadith came in two wordings; this is one of them: , and it came in a wording with this meaning: , but the correct wording is: these three types, this is what should be relied upon in narrating this hadith from the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him and his family); because the other wordings, in addition to being weaker in narration, contradict the explicit texts that say: there is no misfortune in Islam, there is no taking an omen as a bad sign in Islam. The Messenger (peace be upon him) prohibited taking an omen as a bad sign; so how would he approve it and affirm its existence in a house, a woman, and a horse? No, this is anomalous in terms of narration, and the preserved, authentic narration is: .
This is the answer to this question.
Please proceed.