"Tell Abu Thabit to seek refuge" and the hadith was weakened due to Uthman al-Hakim narrating from his grandmother Rabab, for Uthman and his grandmother Rabab are unknown, as in
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : ... that it is weak: I weakened the hadith because of Uthman ibn Hakim who narrates from his grandmother al-Rabab. I said, as in al-Taqrib, he is unknown and his grandmother al-Rabab is unknown. So we consulted al-Taqrib and found that there are two Uthman ibn Hakims: one Uthman ibn Hakim is trustworthy and the other Uthman ibn Hakim is unknown. But we did not know which one narrates from his grandmother al-Rabab. We returned to the original source, Tadhhib al-Tadhhib, and found that the Uthman ibn Hakim who narrates from his grandmother al-Rabab is the trustworthy one, while the second Uthman ibn Hakim is the unknown one. So what is your comment?
The Shaykh : What is my comment? What is the benefit of this?
The questioner : I mean the hadith ... .
The Shaykh : Did you understand what I am saying? I do not think so. What do I want? If it is established that this is the trustworthy one and not the acceptable one according to al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar, does the hadith become established by that?
The questioner : No, the grandmother al-Rabab is unknown. But Uthman ibn Hakim
The Shaykh : May Allah guide you ... Does the hadith become established by that? Well, what is the benefit of this question?
The questioner : I do not mean, I mean, is the hadith authentic or weak ... .
The Shaykh : May Allah guide you. I told you just now to ask very important questions. Now, your question is scholarly and precise. What do the attendees benefit from it, as long as the hadith remains weak?
The questioner : Our Shaykh, I mean ... .
The Shaykh : My brother, I know your intention. Did you understand my intention?
The questioner : Yes. Uthman ibn Hakim ... .
The Shaykh : What is my intention?
The questioner : I intended that you said the hadith is weak.
The Shaykh : I tell you your question is scholarly and precise. If it is established that what you read was an error and what you mentioned is correct, then regarding the hadith, you have not gained its authenticity. However, if the implication of that is taking the hadith from weakness to authenticity, that is a very important matter. But since you are admitting now and saying: No, the hadith will remain weak because of the unknownness of the other narrator, what is the benefit of such a question? This question is asked in a private session or over the phone, and at that time I open the book ... .
Tell Abu Thabit to seek refuge ...
مروا أبا ثابت فليتعوذ ...The Shaykh : What is my comment? What is the benefit of this?
The questioner : I mean the hadith ... .
The Shaykh : Did you understand what I am saying? I do not think so. What do I want? If it is established that this is the trustworthy one and not the acceptable one according to al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar, does the hadith become established by that?
The questioner : No, the grandmother al-Rabab is unknown. But Uthman ibn Hakim
The Shaykh : May Allah guide you ... Does the hadith become established by that? Well, what is the benefit of this question?
The questioner : I do not mean, I mean, is the hadith authentic or weak ... .
The Shaykh : May Allah guide you. I told you just now to ask very important questions. Now, your question is scholarly and precise. What do the attendees benefit from it, as long as the hadith remains weak?
The questioner : Our Shaykh, I mean ... .
The Shaykh : My brother, I know your intention. Did you understand my intention?
The questioner : Yes. Uthman ibn Hakim ... .
The Shaykh : What is my intention?
The questioner : I intended that you said the hadith is weak.
The Shaykh : I tell you your question is scholarly and precise. If it is established that what you read was an error and what you mentioned is correct, then regarding the hadith, you have not gained its authenticity. However, if the implication of that is taking the hadith from weakness to authenticity, that is a very important matter. But since you are admitting now and saying: No, the hadith will remain weak because of the unknownness of the other narrator, what is the benefit of such a question? This question is asked in a private session or over the phone, and at that time I open the book ... .