Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

What is the ruling on an image from which has been removed that which, if absent, life would not remain?

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : I heard some jurists say: The matter is that the image commanded to be defaced is the one that, if seen in its complete form, one would say: a person can live in this state. But if a part of it is separated, he cannot, meaning...

The Shaykh : Yes, meaning they said: If that which, if removed from the image, would cause life not to remain is removed, then it is permissible. This is the view of the scholars, the jurists, may Allah have mercy on them. They say: If that which, if removed from the image, would cause life not to remain is removed, then it is permissible. They cite as evidence for this the saying of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) regarding the painters: they are told,
Bring to life what you have created. أحيوا ما خلقتم
.
And His saying:
he will be asked to infuse spirit therein, which he will not be able to do كُلِّف أن ينفخ فيها الروح وليس بنافخ
Riyad as-Salihin 1544
. The spirit and life do not settle in half of the body, for example. Therefore, they said, may Allah have mercy on them: If that which, if removed from the image, would cause life not to remain is removed, then it becomes permissible.
So if the image is cut in half, for example, or if its head is cut off entirely, then it is permissible. Yes, in one of them, I think in one of the ones that came recently, they had a question.
Source alathar.net

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas