Explanation of the Book on Ablution, the Full Ritual Bath, Menstruation, and Dry Ablution-03b
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The reciter: Ishaq narrated to us, saying: Abd al-Samad informed us, saying: Abd al-Rahman ibn Abdullah ibn Dinar narrated to us, saying: I heard my father from Abu Salih from Abu Hurayrah from the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him): Sahih al-Bukhari 173.
The Shaykh : And this indicates that the vessel does not become ritually impure if a dog licks in it, because the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) did not mention that this man changed his sandal or washed it. However, it is said that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) did not narrate the hadith for this purpose, but rather narrated it solely for the incident itself. Whether he washed his sandal or did not wash it, or whether he prayed in it or did not pray in it, was their practice before the obligation of ritual purity, or before the non-obligation of it?
This is what he addressed, so there is no basis for using it as evidence that it is not obligatory to wash the vessel if a dog licks in it.
A man saw a dog eating mud from (the severity of) thirst. So, that man took a shoe (and filled it) with water and kept on pouring the water for the dog till it quenched its thirst. So Allah approved of his deed and made him to enter Paradise.
أن رجلا رأى كلبا يأكل الثرى من العطش فأخذ الرجل خفه فجعل يغرف له به حتى أرواه فشكر الله له فأدخله الجنةThe Shaykh : And this indicates that the vessel does not become ritually impure if a dog licks in it, because the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him) did not mention that this man changed his sandal or washed it. However, it is said that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) did not narrate the hadith for this purpose, but rather narrated it solely for the incident itself. Whether he washed his sandal or did not wash it, or whether he prayed in it or did not pray in it, was their practice before the obligation of ritual purity, or before the non-obligation of it?
This is what he addressed, so there is no basis for using it as evidence that it is not obligatory to wash the vessel if a dog licks in it.