And their methodology is invalid from several angles: the first is that it is an encroachment upon the texts, as they made them indicative of an invalid meaning that is not befitting of Allah, and which He did not intend.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh :"And their methodology is invalid from several angles:
The first is that it is an encroachment upon the texts, as they made them indicative of an invalid meaning that is not befitting of Allah, and which He did not intend".
What is the invalid meaning? Likening Allah to creation. They made this indication primary, and then when they perceived this, they distorted it to a meaning that is befitting of Allah, in their claim. Yes.
"The second is that it diverts the speech of Allah and the speech of His Messenger, (peace and blessings be upon him and his family), from its apparent meaning".
Because if we asked a questioner, what is the apparent meaning of the saying of Allah the Exalted? It is that He Himself came, (Glorified and Exalted is He). They diverted it from the apparent meaning and said His command came. "And Allah the Exalted addressed the people in a clear Arabic tongue".
The first is that it is an encroachment upon the texts, as they made them indicative of an invalid meaning that is not befitting of Allah, and which He did not intend".
What is the invalid meaning? Likening Allah to creation. They made this indication primary, and then when they perceived this, they distorted it to a meaning that is befitting of Allah, in their claim. Yes.
"The second is that it diverts the speech of Allah and the speech of His Messenger, (peace and blessings be upon him and his family), from its apparent meaning".
Because if we asked a questioner, what is the apparent meaning of the saying of Allah the Exalted