Mentioning the Quranic aspects in ((bat-takhadhtum)) and ((ba-ri'akum))

The Shaykh : And what do you say, Isma'il?

The questioner : I say there are two readings in it: and ?

The Shaykh : I have readings in it: this is a reading and . That is, reading: and in it is a reading: silencing the yaa or the hamza, yes, as for there is no reading in it.
The questioner : I have a reading in this.
The Shaykh : Where is this? What is the book you have? What is it? You read the izhar and the idgham, the idgham the dhal with the taa, you say: and meaning you make the dhal clear or you merge the dhal you say: the argument for the one who makes it clear is that he brought the word in its original form ...and on every letter of it, and the argument is that the baa, the taa, and the dhal are pronounced from the tip of the tongue and the tips of the tongue ...., the idgham with the dhal is not with the hamza.

The questioner : Does the merged letter appear at a time?

The Shaykh : No, it does not appear, because the two letters are emphatic.

The questioner : And the hamzat al-wasl?

The Shaykh : The apparent is that the hamzat al-wasl goes away.........