What is your comment on the statement of the Shaykh al-Islam in the Tadmuriyyah: "And for this reason, Abu Ubayd and others say..."
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : ... the Shaykh al-Islam in the Hama Fatwa stated that the jurists declared, meaning the language of... the bare body.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : ... is taken from it... .
The Shaykh : It is undoubtedly the case that interpreting it as covering the body with a garment from one side is stronger in the sense that it is an interpretation that is either marfu' (traced to the Prophet) or from a Companion. However, in terms of the meaning indicated by "ishtimal al-sama," the meaning that it is a garment that covers the entire body is closer in terms of wording to what is... Ibn Daqiq said.
The questioner : ... the hadith...
The Shaykh : Why do we not say both things?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : I say we say both things. This is forbidden because it involves the exposure of the 'awrah, which is the interpretation of the jurists. And this is also either disliked or forbidden if there is a fear of death. Yes, there is no objection.
The questioner : ... The Shaykh.
The Shaykh : I say there is no objection that it is interpreted by this and that.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : We say that even this, as long as it is accepted by the language, is mentioned by way of example. This is from the category of variation in diversity that occurs by way of example. Yes.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : ... is taken from it... .
The Shaykh : It is undoubtedly the case that interpreting it as covering the body with a garment from one side is stronger in the sense that it is an interpretation that is either marfu' (traced to the Prophet) or from a Companion. However, in terms of the meaning indicated by "ishtimal al-sama," the meaning that it is a garment that covers the entire body is closer in terms of wording to what is... Ibn Daqiq said.
The questioner : ... the hadith...
The Shaykh : Why do we not say both things?
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : I say we say both things. This is forbidden because it involves the exposure of the 'awrah, which is the interpretation of the jurists. And this is also either disliked or forbidden if there is a fear of death. Yes, there is no objection.
The questioner : ... The Shaykh.
The Shaykh : I say there is no objection that it is interpreted by this and that.
The questioner : ... .
The Shaykh : We say that even this, as long as it is accepted by the language, is mentioned by way of example. This is from the category of variation in diversity that occurs by way of example. Yes.