Reading from the author's text with commentary and collation of manuscripts: "Because the two statements are contradictory
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The reader: "Because the two statements are contradictory, but we find that many of these people may have a false statement, yet with their opponent there is some truth, or with them there is evidence that necessitates some truth, so the truth is refuted in the original, all of this". This, this
The Shaykh : The expression is awkward; the truth is refuted in all of this, this is the apparent meaning.
The reader: It says in the printed edition: "in this entire original, there is transposition and rearrangement, which is an interpretation of the expression that makes it clearer, but all the handwritten manuscripts are as I have recorded".
The Shaykh : Not the apparent meaning, and do you have Hamed with you?
The reader: So the truth is refuted in this entire original.
The Shaykh : Yes, this is the apparent meaning. Glory be to Allah, if the editor, if the printed edition is correct, why do we reject it? We are now talking about refuting the truth, yes. That means some people refute the statement that contradicts them, even if it contains some truth, and they refute the whole thing, yes.
The reader: "until this remains refuted in part, just as the first was refuted in the original, as I have seen it for many of the people of the Sunnah in matters of divine decree, attributes, and the Companions, and others".
The Shaykh : This is a mistake. This is a mistake. Now, for example, some people know that he has a standing of truth in the truth and its defense, but he errs in one issue from the issues of the principles that they call principles, so all his good deeds are erased. And we give an example of this in Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him). No one doubts that Ibn Hajar has a standing of truth in reviving the Sunnah, spreading it, and defending it. And yet, we have heard that some... what shall I say... say: It is obligatory to burn *Fath al-Bari* because it is misguidance. This is a great error. Rather, we must take what is in it of truth and comment on what is in it that contradicts the truth, yes.
The Shaykh : The expression is awkward; the truth is refuted in all of this, this is the apparent meaning.
The reader: It says in the printed edition: "in this entire original, there is transposition and rearrangement, which is an interpretation of the expression that makes it clearer, but all the handwritten manuscripts are as I have recorded".
The Shaykh : Not the apparent meaning, and do you have Hamed with you?
The reader: So the truth is refuted in this entire original.
The Shaykh : Yes, this is the apparent meaning. Glory be to Allah, if the editor, if the printed edition is correct, why do we reject it? We are now talking about refuting the truth, yes. That means some people refute the statement that contradicts them, even if it contains some truth, and they refute the whole thing, yes.
The reader: "until this remains refuted in part, just as the first was refuted in the original, as I have seen it for many of the people of the Sunnah in matters of divine decree, attributes, and the Companions, and others".
The Shaykh : This is a mistake. This is a mistake. Now, for example, some people know that he has a standing of truth in the truth and its defense, but he errs in one issue from the issues of the principles that they call principles, so all his good deeds are erased. And we give an example of this in Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him). No one doubts that Ibn Hajar has a standing of truth in reviving the Sunnah, spreading it, and defending it. And yet, we have heard that some... what shall I say... say: It is obligatory to burn *Fath al-Bari* because it is misguidance. This is a great error. Rather, we must take what is in it of truth and comment on what is in it that contradicts the truth, yes.