Reading from the author's text with commentary and collation of manuscripts: "And there is a report regarding wearing the belt

The reader: "And there is a report regarding wearing the belt, and this is not the place for that discussion. Similarly, his words waver regarding the Persian bow. Al-Athram said: I asked Abu 'Abdullah about the Persian bow, and he said: 'The people's bows were only Arab bows.' Then he said: 'Some people argued with the hadith of 'Umar (may Allah be pleased with him):" quivers and leather "I said: The hadith of Abu 'Amr ibn Hammas? He said: 'Yes.' The hadith of Ibn 'Umar ibn Hammas? He said: 'Yes.' Abu 'Abdullah said: 'Then let there be no quiver except for the Persian bow, and the arrows, for they are only horn.' Al-Athram said: I said to Abu 'Abdullah: In Mujahid's interpretation: {Our hearts are in coverings}, he said: 'Like a quiver for arrows.' He said: 'If it is called a quiver for arrows, then what the one who said this argued with is of no value.' Then he said: 'It should be asked of the experts in Arabic about this.'"

The Shaykh : The experts
The reader: "It should be asked of the experts in Arabic about this"

The Shaykh : This is from his humility that he referred the issue to the scholars of Arabic, because Imam Ahmad (may Allah have mercy on him) had some colloquial language in his speech, and therefore in his answers he would say "ish" (what) and "ish" (what) and colloquial speech. So (may Allah have mercy on him) intended to refer this matter to Arabic: is it called a quiver or is it not called a quiver? Yes.