If an objector argues in the issue of the purity of the meat of animals that are eaten that the hadith of the 'Uraynah is more specific than the indication, how do we respond to him?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : Yes?
The questioner : May Allah reward you. If someone were to say to us: In the issue of the purity of the urine and dung of animals that are eaten.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : If he were to say: This evidence is more specific than the indication?
The Shaykh : Which one?
The questioner : We argued for the purity of the urine and dung using the hadith of the 'Uraynah, which is about the urine of camels.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : And the prayer, meaning in the pens of sheep.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : How do we respond to him, given that we generalized, meaning?
The Shaykh : Yes, because the rest we analogize to it; the cause is one, and that is that the excrement of this animal that is eaten is pure, its sweat is pure, its saliva is pure, all its excretions.
The questioner : May Allah reward you. If someone were to say to us: In the issue of the purity of the urine and dung of animals that are eaten.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : If he were to say: This evidence is more specific than the indication?
The Shaykh : Which one?
The questioner : We argued for the purity of the urine and dung using the hadith of the 'Uraynah, which is about the urine of camels.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : And the prayer, meaning in the pens of sheep.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : How do we respond to him, given that we generalized, meaning?
The Shaykh : Yes, because the rest we analogize to it; the cause is one, and that is that the excrement of this animal that is eaten is pure, its sweat is pure, its saliva is pure, all its excretions.