The Supplication for Leaving the Home (In the name of Allah, I place my trust in Allah...) Is it compiled from multiple chains?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : Regarding al-Sha'bi and the supplication for leaving the home, he mentions several supplications, as if it is a compilation in one supplication: Sunan Abi Dawud 5094Sahih (Al-Albani), the supplication for leaving the home.
The student : The hadith of Umm Salama.
The questioner : Yes, the supplication for leaving the home:Sunan Abi Dawud 5094Sahih (Al-Albani). As I have heard, this hadith is compiled from multiple chains and has become one hadith.
The Shaykh : O Allah, I seek refuge in You lest I mislead.
The questioner :Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah 22:80 .
The Shaykh : This has no relation to the mosque.
The questioner : Leaving the home.
The student : Another question, meaning...
The Shaykh : The home? Yes, what is the question?
The questioner : Is this hadith a compilation from several chains that were then reduced to a single chain, meaning that several hadiths became one?
The student : They combined all the wordings in one hadith, and it is from multiple narrators, meaning from multiple chains.
The Shaykh : First, in which book are you speaking about a wording that exists?
The questioner : I did not return to the book regarding this.
The Shaykh : Well, then what are you asking me about?
The questioner : The question is: the hadith is compiled from multiple chains, and they presented it as one hadith. Does this mean it is a hadith transmitted in its complete form, or from multiple chains? For example...Sunan Abi Dawud 5094Sahih (Al-Albani) a second hadith Jami` at-Tirmidhi 3427Da’if (Darussalam), so they combined these chains and made it one hadith.
The Shaykh: All right.
The student : Shaykh, perhaps I can clarify the story of the question.
The Shaykh : If you permit, you must have looked at my abridgment of Sahih al-Bukhari?
The questioner : No, I have not looked at it completely.
The Shaykh : I am not asking if you looked at it completely. Did you look at the first part?
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : Leave "Mukhtasar al-Bukhari" aside. Have you looked at "Sifat al-Salah"? You must have.
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : Well, you will see that some supplications have additions placed between brackets. Well, these additions, whether in the aforementioned abridgment, or in "Sifat al-Salah," or in any of my books, are subject to two conditions: The first is that the narrator of this hadith is one Companion from one Companion, meaning I do not combine a hadith of one Companion with another Companion. No, but one Companion may have one narrator from the Tabi'un, for example, and then a narrator of that Tabi'i, and then the chains branch out. These chains may have some adding to others in this single hadith. This is the first condition, which is that the Companion is one. The second condition is that the addition I place between brackets is established. I place it in the position where it came in the complete narration. This is what I have followed in many of my books. Does the hadith of leaving the home have such additions? Are you referring to the additions?
The questioner : No, not the additions.
The Shaykh : Then what is your question?
The questioner : My question is, I mean, is it authentic? Is this action authentic?
The Shaykh : Authentic, of course.
The questioner : The one that is the supplication for leaving the home, and not...
The Shaykh : Yes, is not this.
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : This is correct.
The questioner : Our Shaykh, regarding the shadhdh (anomalous narration).
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner : Regarding the shadhdh.
The Shaykh : Regarding what?
The questioner : The shadhdh, the shadhdh hadith.
The Shaykh : The shadhdh, ah.
The questioner : Ibn Hajar in "al-Nuzhah," of course, after the definition of contradicting the acceptable by one who is more trustworthy, and al-Shafi'i in "al-Risalah" defining it as contradicting the trustworthy by one who is more trustworthy. Of course, according to the first definition, it falls into the grade of hasan (good), and according to the second definition, it does not enter the grade of hasan. So, what is your opinion, O Shaykh, meaning from the perspective of your rules?
The Shaykh : Unfortunately, some of the speech is lost on me because there is a hadith there. I mean, is there anything new in your question besides what we discussed just now?
The questioner : I am saying, what do you adopt, our Shaykh?
The Shaykh : How?
The questioner : I mean, I feel as if you adopt the contradiction of the acceptable by the shadhdh. Is this what you adopt, or the contradiction of the trustworthy? It is a technical term, meaning the naming of the acceptable.
O Allah! I seek refuge in Thee lest I stray or be led astray
اللهمَّ إني أعوذ بك أن أضلَّ أو أُضلَّThe student : The hadith of Umm Salama.
The questioner : Yes, the supplication for leaving the home:
O Allah! I seek refuge in Thee lest I stray or be led astray
اللهمَّ إنِّي أعوذ بك أن أضلَّ أو أُضلَّThe Shaykh : O Allah, I seek refuge in You lest I mislead.
The questioner :
In the name of Allah, I place my trust in Allah, and there is no power nor strength except in Allah.
بسم الله ، توكَّلت على الله ، ولا حول ولا قوة إلا باللهThe Shaykh : This has no relation to the mosque.
The questioner : Leaving the home.
The student : Another question, meaning...
The Shaykh : The home? Yes, what is the question?
The questioner : Is this hadith a compilation from several chains that were then reduced to a single chain, meaning that several hadiths became one?
The student : They combined all the wordings in one hadith, and it is from multiple narrators, meaning from multiple chains.
The Shaykh : First, in which book are you speaking about a wording that exists?
The questioner : I did not return to the book regarding this.
The Shaykh : Well, then what are you asking me about?
The questioner : The question is: the hadith is compiled from multiple chains, and they presented it as one hadith. Does this mean it is a hadith transmitted in its complete form, or from multiple chains? For example...
O Allah! I seek refuge in Thee lest I stray or be led astray
اللهم إني أعوذ بك أن أضلَّ أو أُضلَّIn the Name of Allah, I place my trust in Allah
بسم الله ، توكَّلت على اللهThe Shaykh: All right.
The student : Shaykh, perhaps I can clarify the story of the question.
The Shaykh : If you permit, you must have looked at my abridgment of Sahih al-Bukhari?
The questioner : No, I have not looked at it completely.
The Shaykh : I am not asking if you looked at it completely. Did you look at the first part?
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : Leave "Mukhtasar al-Bukhari" aside. Have you looked at "Sifat al-Salah"? You must have.
The questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : Well, you will see that some supplications have additions placed between brackets. Well, these additions, whether in the aforementioned abridgment, or in "Sifat al-Salah," or in any of my books, are subject to two conditions: The first is that the narrator of this hadith is one Companion from one Companion, meaning I do not combine a hadith of one Companion with another Companion. No, but one Companion may have one narrator from the Tabi'un, for example, and then a narrator of that Tabi'i, and then the chains branch out. These chains may have some adding to others in this single hadith. This is the first condition, which is that the Companion is one. The second condition is that the addition I place between brackets is established. I place it in the position where it came in the complete narration. This is what I have followed in many of my books. Does the hadith of leaving the home have such additions? Are you referring to the additions?
The questioner : No, not the additions.
The Shaykh : Then what is your question?
The questioner : My question is, I mean, is it authentic? Is this action authentic?
The Shaykh : Authentic, of course.
The questioner : The one that is the supplication for leaving the home, and not...
The Shaykh : Yes,
In the name of Allah, I place my trust in Allah, O Allah, I seek refuge in You lest I slip or be made to slip, or mislead or be misled, or wrong or be wronged, or be ignorant or be treated ignorantly.
بسم الله ، توكَّلت على الله ، اللهمَّ إنِّي أعوذ بك أن أزلَّ أو أُزلَّ ، أو أضلَّ أو أُضلَّ ، أو أظلمَ أو أُظلمَ ، أو أجهلَ أو يُجهَلَ عليَّThe questioner: Yes.
The Shaykh : This is correct.
The questioner : Our Shaykh, regarding the shadhdh (anomalous narration).
The Shaykh: Yes.
The questioner : Regarding the shadhdh.
The Shaykh : Regarding what?
The questioner : The shadhdh, the shadhdh hadith.
The Shaykh : The shadhdh, ah.
The questioner : Ibn Hajar in "al-Nuzhah," of course, after the definition of contradicting the acceptable by one who is more trustworthy, and al-Shafi'i in "al-Risalah" defining it as contradicting the trustworthy by one who is more trustworthy. Of course, according to the first definition, it falls into the grade of hasan (good), and according to the second definition, it does not enter the grade of hasan. So, what is your opinion, O Shaykh, meaning from the perspective of your rules?
The Shaykh : Unfortunately, some of the speech is lost on me because there is a hadith there. I mean, is there anything new in your question besides what we discussed just now?
The questioner : I am saying, what do you adopt, our Shaykh?
The Shaykh : How?
The questioner : I mean, I feel as if you adopt the contradiction of the acceptable by the shadhdh. Is this what you adopt, or the contradiction of the trustworthy? It is a technical term, meaning the naming of the acceptable.
Source
www.al-albany.com
The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.
