Explanation of the author's statement: And his saying: (Lawful to you are the livestock of the herd, except what is recited to you, not being in a state of consecration for hunting while you are in the state of consecration. Indeed, Allah judges what He wills)

The Shaykh : He said, and his saying is all in the genitive case, connected to what came before .
The One who makes things lawful is Allah, Mighty and Majestic, and likewise the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) makes things lawful and forbidden, but by the permission of Allah, Mighty and Majestic. The Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said: Yes, and he (peace and blessings be upon him) used to say thus, informing that it is forbidden, and sometimes he would forbid something with a prohibition that he kept to himself. For this reason, he said: meaning, Allah and His Messenger made it lawful.
These are camels, cattle, and sheep. "Al-An'am" is the plural of "na'am," just as "asbab" is the plural of "sabab." "Na'am" refers to these three: camels, cattle, and sheep. And his saying it is called that because it is what? Mubahamah, meaning it does not speak; it is mute.
Meaning, except what is recited to you in this surah, which is mentioned in the saying of Allah the Exalted to the end. So is the exception here connected or disconnected? Okay, is the dead animal from the livestock of the herd or not? No, my brothers, a sheep dies, a camel dies, a cow dies. The point is, it was made lawful except for this; the livestock was made lawful except for the dead one, correct? But I say that this exception contains both a connected and a disconnected part. Regarding the dead animal, it is connected; regarding the flesh of the pig, it is disconnected. Why? Because it is not from the livestock of the herd. And based on this, we say: The livestock of the herd, except what is recited to you in this surah, which is the dead animal, blood, the flesh of the pig, what is dedicated to other than Allah, the strangled, the beaten to death, the fallen, the gored, and what the wild animal has eaten, except what you slaughter lawfully, and what is slaughtered on the stone altars. These ten are forbidden.
And his saying: This is a state (hal) of the kaf in , meaning the state of you not making hunting lawful while you are in the state of consecration. And this exception is also disconnected because hunting is not from the livestock of the herd, for the livestock of the herd is not hunting.
And his saying: How is "muhilli" (making lawful)? It means making it permissible in the state of consecration, because the one who does the thing is like the one who makes it lawful. And is the wild, untamed, edible land animal. This is the hunting that is forbidden in the state of consecration.
His saying Is this will (iradah) cosmic or legislative? What is the evidence? Well, because the context is one of legislation, it is a legislative will. It is permissible that it be a legislative cosmic will, and we attribute the ruling to both the cosmic and the legislative. What He willed cosmically, He ruled with it, and what He willed legislatively, He ruled with it and legislated it for His servants. Okay, and He, the Exalted, said.