Ibn Aqil gave as an example the phrase "every man and his garment," and we understood that the intended meaning of the conjunction is that the ruling is that he has dominion over it?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The student: Ibn Aqil gave as an example: "every man and his garment."
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: And we understood that the intended meaning of the conjunction is that it is a ruling that he has dominion over it.
The Shaykh : But it is his garment, or otherwise his craft.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Well, clothing, yes, but we said that if the norm is conjunction, then omission is preferred; if the conjunction is necessary, then omission is obligatory; and if it is this and that, then they are equal.
Now, there is no custom of a man coming in a state of undress; the custom is that every man has his garment, yes, unless, for example, a person came and gave clothes to people, giving each one clothes, in which case I might say "every man and his garment," meaning they are accompanying each other, for example.
The student: ... likewise.
The Shaykh : Which of them?
The student: I say, as an example, regarding the subject that ...
The Shaykh : Which of them?
The student: The subject.
The Shaykh : Read
The student: He said that the subject should be explicit in ...
The Shaykh : And what is this omission of the predicate?
The student: Omission of the predicate, yes, that is right.
The Shaykh : Well, read.
The student: Obligatory, such as "By your life, I will certainly do it." The implied meaning is: "By your life, I swear; by your life is the subject and I swear is the predicate."
The Shaykh : No, no, the text is the speech now regarding the predicate; the speech is regarding the predicate.
The student: Refer to ...
The Shaykh : Refer to it, may Allah reward you, in *Awadh al-Masalik*. I have not referred to it, you see; my explanation now is based on previous understanding, but you should refer to *Awadh al-Masalik*.
The student: If it were said, "And as an example, by the oath of Allah, I will certainly do it," the implied meaning is "By Allah, I swear," and it is not necessary that the omitted part be a predicate, because it is permissible for it to be a subject, and the implied meaning is "I swear by the oath," unlike "By 'Amr," where the omitted part with it is ...
The Shaykh : Correct, it is known, because of the presence of the lam, it is known.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: And we understood that the intended meaning of the conjunction is that it is a ruling that he has dominion over it.
The Shaykh : But it is his garment, or otherwise his craft.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Well, clothing, yes, but we said that if the norm is conjunction, then omission is preferred; if the conjunction is necessary, then omission is obligatory; and if it is this and that, then they are equal.
Now, there is no custom of a man coming in a state of undress; the custom is that every man has his garment, yes, unless, for example, a person came and gave clothes to people, giving each one clothes, in which case I might say "every man and his garment," meaning they are accompanying each other, for example.
The student: ... likewise.
The Shaykh : Which of them?
The student: I say, as an example, regarding the subject that ...
The Shaykh : Which of them?
The student: The subject.
The Shaykh : Read
The student: He said that the subject should be explicit in ...
The Shaykh : And what is this omission of the predicate?
The student: Omission of the predicate, yes, that is right.
The Shaykh : Well, read.
The student: Obligatory, such as "By your life, I will certainly do it." The implied meaning is: "By your life, I swear; by your life is the subject and I swear is the predicate."
The Shaykh : No, no, the text is the speech now regarding the predicate; the speech is regarding the predicate.
The student: Refer to ...
The Shaykh : Refer to it, may Allah reward you, in *Awadh al-Masalik*. I have not referred to it, you see; my explanation now is based on previous understanding, but you should refer to *Awadh al-Masalik*.
The student: If it were said, "And as an example, by the oath of Allah, I will certainly do it," the implied meaning is "By Allah, I swear," and it is not necessary that the omitted part be a predicate, because it is permissible for it to be a subject, and the implied meaning is "I swear by the oath," unlike "By 'Amr," where the omitted part with it is ...
The Shaykh : Correct, it is known, because of the presence of the lam, it is known.