Is completion required in *layta*, *la'all*, and *ka-anna* because they do not accept coordination with their nominative case by the accusative?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Very well.
The questioner : Okay, Shaykh, why are all the examples after they have been completed?
The Shaykh : How?
The questioner : The examples that came in *layta*, *ka-anna*, and *la'all* are after they have been completed.
The Shaykh : Yes, this is the statement of Ibn Malik.
The questioner : But Ibn Malik, regarding *in*...
The Shaykh :"And it is permissible for you to raise" "And it is permissible for you to raise a coordinated word with *** the accusative of *in* after you have completed it"
and he attached it to *in* meaning in the permissibility of the nominative case "but *wa-anna* without *layta*"
The questioner : Is completion required?
The Shaykh : Yes, it is necessary. If it is not completed, the accusative case is obligatory for all. If you say "In Zayd and 'Amr are in the house," it is obligatory; it is not permissible to say "and 'Amr" in the nominative case.
The questioner : ... in *in*
The Shaykh : In *in* and others, before completion, the coordinated word must be in the accusative case. After completion, these particles are divided into two categories: a category where both the nominative and accusative cases are permissible for the coordinated word, and there are three: *in* and *anna*
The student: But
The Shaykh : but, and a category where only the accusative case is permissible, and those are *layta*, *la'all*, and *ka-anna*.
The questioner : So it is necessary that they all be completed.
The Shaykh : Yes, completion is necessary for all of them. Yes.
The questioner : Shaykh, the news of *layta*, *la'all*, and *ka-anna*
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : The coordinated word, is it possible... to be in the nominative case as a word coordinated with the subject?
The Shaykh : Yes, it may be coordinated with the subject.
The questioner : It is valid.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is correct, it is correct.
The questioner : It is permissible, meaning
The Shaykh : and it is permissible.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Very well.
The questioner : Okay, Shaykh, why are all the examples after they have been completed?
The Shaykh : How?
The questioner : The examples that came in *layta*, *ka-anna*, and *la'all* are after they have been completed.
The Shaykh : Yes, this is the statement of Ibn Malik.
The questioner : But Ibn Malik, regarding *in*...
The Shaykh :"And it is permissible for you to raise" "And it is permissible for you to raise a coordinated word with *** the accusative of *in* after you have completed it"
and he attached it to *in* meaning in the permissibility of the nominative case "but *wa-anna* without *layta*"
The questioner : Is completion required?
The Shaykh : Yes, it is necessary. If it is not completed, the accusative case is obligatory for all. If you say "In Zayd and 'Amr are in the house," it is obligatory; it is not permissible to say "and 'Amr" in the nominative case.
The questioner : ... in *in*
The Shaykh : In *in* and others, before completion, the coordinated word must be in the accusative case. After completion, these particles are divided into two categories: a category where both the nominative and accusative cases are permissible for the coordinated word, and there are three: *in* and *anna*
The student: But
The Shaykh : but, and a category where only the accusative case is permissible, and those are *layta*, *la'all*, and *ka-anna*.
The questioner : So it is necessary that they all be completed.
The Shaykh : Yes, completion is necessary for all of them. Yes.
The questioner : Shaykh, the news of *layta*, *la'all*, and *ka-anna*
The Shaykh : Yes
The questioner : The coordinated word, is it possible... to be in the nominative case as a word coordinated with the subject?
The Shaykh : Yes, it may be coordinated with the subject.
The questioner : It is valid.
The Shaykh : Yes, it is correct, it is correct.
The questioner : It is permissible, meaning
The Shaykh : and it is permissible.
The questioner : ...