Questions about the meaning of Ibn Malik’s verse: “... And it is permissible for you to raise a conjoined word *** if it is in the accusative case, provided that after ‘an’ you complete it...”?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : The reason is that the meaning differs. If you say “Zayd is like one who understands,” and “Amr is one who understands,” both are understood. But our discussion is when the conjunction is with the noun, and the author says: “It is permissible for you to raise a conjoined word” what? In the accusative case if it is with the noun.
The questioner : Meaning, in the last three cases, the accusative case is obligatory, whether...
The Shaykh : Yes, whether before completing it or after.
The questioner : The obligation of the accusative case is always.
The Shaykh : The obligation of the accusative case is always. Yes, very well.
The questioner : Meaning, in the last three cases, the accusative case is obligatory, whether...
The Shaykh : Yes, whether before completing it or after.
The questioner : The obligation of the accusative case is always.
The Shaykh : The obligation of the accusative case is always. Yes, very well.