Explanation of the words of Ibn Malik (may Allah have mercy on him): "And the second of them is like the second of *kasā* *** so it follows it in every ruling."
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : He (may Allah have mercy on him) says: "And the second of them" meaning: the second of the two objects in the case where a verb takes two objects via the hamzah, like a verb taking two objects, "and the second of them is like the second of *kasā*" and the second of *kasā* is not essential, and it is permissible to omit it frequently, for this reason he said: "so it follows it in every ruling" The word *kasā* takes two objects, but their original form is not the subject and the predicate, for this reason it is not correct to report the second about the first, so it takes two objects whose original form is not the subject and the predicate, its example is: I clothed Zayd with a jacket, how many does this take?
The student: Two objects.
The Shaykh : Two objects, but these two objects are not essential, for this reason if you omitted them and said: I clothed Zayd, it is correct, we omitted the second of them, if you omitted the first and said: I clothed a jacket?
The student: Correct.
The Shaykh : It is correct, if you omitted them all and said: Today I clothed, it is also correct, because they are not essential, alright, the sign that they are essential is that it is correct to report the second about the first, and it is known that it is not correct to report about Zayd with the jacket, do not say Zayd is a jacket, alright, he said:
"And the second of them *** so it follows it in every ruling"
This verse is a completion of the content of the first verse, since the first suffices for it, if he had said "and the second of them is like the second of *kasā*" the generality would require it to be equal to it in every ruling, but he affirmed that by saying: "so it follows it in every ruling"
The student: Two objects.
The Shaykh : Two objects, but these two objects are not essential, for this reason if you omitted them and said: I clothed Zayd, it is correct, we omitted the second of them, if you omitted the first and said: I clothed a jacket?
The student: Correct.
The Shaykh : It is correct, if you omitted them all and said: Today I clothed, it is also correct, because they are not essential, alright, the sign that they are essential is that it is correct to report the second about the first, and it is known that it is not correct to report about Zayd with the jacket, do not say Zayd is a jacket, alright, he said:
"And the second of them *** so it follows it in every ruling"
This verse is a completion of the content of the first verse, since the first suffices for it, if he had said "and the second of them is like the second of *kasā*" the generality would require it to be equal to it in every ruling, but he affirmed that by saying: "so it follows it in every ruling"