Continuation of the discussion of what was previously taken in the chapter on engagement.
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : Does 'Amr strike him?
The student: 'Amr strikes him.
The Shaykh : Do you agree with this?
The student: Yes.
Another student: Another example.
The Shaykh : No, no, correct, the example is correct, the second state is nominative?
The student: The second state: that the operator comes after the word.
The Shaykh : After a particle.
The student: After a particle that does not operate on what comes before it.
The Shaykh : Good, what is its example?
The student: Its example: Zayd, if you honor him, he will honor you.
The Shaykh : He will honor you.
The student: He will honor you.
The Shaykh : Good, another example, 'Abdullah 'Awad?
The student: Yes, where.
The Shaykh : It is not correct in any case, as long as you came with "where," it is correct, did you see your colleague?
The student: Yes?
The Shaykh : Did you see your colleague?
The student: Yes?
The Shaykh : I am asking you, did you see your colleague?
The student: Did you see your colleague?
The Shaykh : I am asking you now.
The student: I did not see him.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: The example is correct, meaning.
The Shaykh : Is the example correct?
The student: Correct.
The Shaykh : Correct, because "hal" is a particle of interrogation.
The student: A particle of interrogation does not operate on what comes before it.
The Shaykh : Well done, may Allah bless you, we have now taken what must be in the accusative, what is preferred, and what must be in the nominative, what is left with us?
The student: What is preferred to be in the nominative and what is equal in both cases.
The Shaykh : What is preferred to be in the nominative, leave it for the end, what is equal in both cases, Adam?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : What is equal in both cases.
The student: What is equal in both cases in other than what has passed.
The Shaykh : No, may you be safe.
The student: Yes?
The Shaykh : May you be safe, Yasser?
The student: I was not present, Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Yes, Samih?
The student: When the name that is engaged with is followed by a verb that informs about it.
The Shaykh : If?
The student: When the name that is engaged with is followed.
The Shaykh : Followed?
The student: Conjunction, meaning.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: When the name is conjoined.
The Shaykh : When conjoined, complete.
The student: When the name that is engaged with is conjoined to a verb that informs about it, good, what is its example? Zayd, I honored him, and 'Amr, or 'Umar, I humiliated him.
The Shaykh : 'Umar and 'Amr are permissible equally, what is the reason for that?
The student: If we consider, the sentence is composed of two sentences: a major sentence and a minor sentence.
The Shaykh : Because it was preceded by two sentences.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : One is preferred, and the second?
The student: The nominative is preferred.
The Shaykh : The nominative, therefore the two cases are equal, because if you look at the sentence as a major sentence.
The student: The accusative is preferred.
The Shaykh : No, in the major sentence the nominative is preferred, because it is the subject, and if you look at the minor sentence which is the predicate, it is permissible in the verbal sentence that the accusative is preferred in the conjunction to it.
The student: A note, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : What?
The student: A note.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: By way of reminder, O Shaykh, we said that reviewing the lesson is to be done after finishing.
The Shaykh : No, we have now finished, and therefore we require you with what is preferred to be in the nominative?
The student: Other than what has passed.
The Shaykh : Other than what has passed, so what is the original rule?
The student: The raising.
The Shaykh : The preference of the nominative, the original rule is the preference of the nominative except if a cause is found, and for this, the obligation of the accusative and the obligation of the nominative and the preference of one of them must have?
The student: A cause.
The Shaykh : A cause, so the original rule is?
The student: The preference of the nominative.
The Shaykh : The preference of the nominative, yes.
The student: 'Amr strikes him.
The Shaykh : Do you agree with this?
The student: Yes.
Another student: Another example.
The Shaykh : No, no, correct, the example is correct, the second state is nominative?
The student: The second state: that the operator comes after the word.
The Shaykh : After a particle.
The student: After a particle that does not operate on what comes before it.
The Shaykh : Good, what is its example?
The student: Its example: Zayd, if you honor him, he will honor you.
The Shaykh : He will honor you.
The student: He will honor you.
The Shaykh : Good, another example, 'Abdullah 'Awad?
The student: Yes, where.
The Shaykh : It is not correct in any case, as long as you came with "where," it is correct, did you see your colleague?
The student: Yes?
The Shaykh : Did you see your colleague?
The student: Yes?
The Shaykh : I am asking you, did you see your colleague?
The student: Did you see your colleague?
The Shaykh : I am asking you now.
The student: I did not see him.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: The example is correct, meaning.
The Shaykh : Is the example correct?
The student: Correct.
The Shaykh : Correct, because "hal" is a particle of interrogation.
The student: A particle of interrogation does not operate on what comes before it.
The Shaykh : Well done, may Allah bless you, we have now taken what must be in the accusative, what is preferred, and what must be in the nominative, what is left with us?
The student: What is preferred to be in the nominative and what is equal in both cases.
The Shaykh : What is preferred to be in the nominative, leave it for the end, what is equal in both cases, Adam?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : What is equal in both cases.
The student: What is equal in both cases in other than what has passed.
The Shaykh : No, may you be safe.
The student: Yes?
The Shaykh : May you be safe, Yasser?
The student: I was not present, Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Yes, Samih?
The student: When the name that is engaged with is followed by a verb that informs about it.
The Shaykh : If?
The student: When the name that is engaged with is followed.
The Shaykh : Followed?
The student: Conjunction, meaning.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: When the name is conjoined.
The Shaykh : When conjoined, complete.
The student: When the name that is engaged with is conjoined to a verb that informs about it, good, what is its example? Zayd, I honored him, and 'Amr, or 'Umar, I humiliated him.
The Shaykh : 'Umar and 'Amr are permissible equally, what is the reason for that?
The student: If we consider, the sentence is composed of two sentences: a major sentence and a minor sentence.
The Shaykh : Because it was preceded by two sentences.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : One is preferred, and the second?
The student: The nominative is preferred.
The Shaykh : The nominative, therefore the two cases are equal, because if you look at the sentence as a major sentence.
The student: The accusative is preferred.
The Shaykh : No, in the major sentence the nominative is preferred, because it is the subject, and if you look at the minor sentence which is the predicate, it is permissible in the verbal sentence that the accusative is preferred in the conjunction to it.
The student: A note, O Shaykh.
The Shaykh : What?
The student: A note.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: By way of reminder, O Shaykh, we said that reviewing the lesson is to be done after finishing.
The Shaykh : No, we have now finished, and therefore we require you with what is preferred to be in the nominative?
The student: Other than what has passed.
The Shaykh : Other than what has passed, so what is the original rule?
The student: The raising.
The Shaykh : The preference of the nominative, the original rule is the preference of the nominative except if a cause is found, and for this, the obligation of the accusative and the obligation of the nominative and the preference of one of them must have?
The student: A cause.
The Shaykh : A cause, so the original rule is?
The student: The preference of the nominative.
The Shaykh : The preference of the nominative, yes.