Does rigidity in the price fall under the phrase "or one who begins with interpretation"?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The student: Rigidity in the price.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: I say rigidity in the price.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: It does not fall under interpretation for one who begins with interpretation.
The Shaykh : No, it is as if the author is making rigidity in the price absolute, whereas in reality he interpreted it to mean "priced," and this implies that it is of the same kind as the one who begins with interpretation. In any case, the price, whatever it is, if it comes, is in the state of being in the accusative case as a circumstantial phrase, and likewise the estimated value other than the price, if we said, for example, "I sold you the land for a price," yes, or did the time end?
The student: Remaining.
The Shaykh : Yes?
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: I say rigidity in the price.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: It does not fall under interpretation for one who begins with interpretation.
The Shaykh : No, it is as if the author is making rigidity in the price absolute, whereas in reality he interpreted it to mean "priced," and this implies that it is of the same kind as the one who begins with interpretation. In any case, the price, whatever it is, if it comes, is in the state of being in the accusative case as a circumstantial phrase, and likewise the estimated value other than the price, if we said, for example, "I sold you the land for a price," yes, or did the time end?
The student: Remaining.
The Shaykh : Yes?