regarding Ibn Malik's statement: "For this reason, upon them, whoever entered"
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : ... but he cited the entry of "man" (whoever) upon them as evidence for the permissibility of using them as a noun.
The student: This is evidence ... from "min" (from) and "an" (about) as two nouns.
The Shaykh : The discussion now is about Ibn Malik's words and the commentator's words; they did not agree, they did not agree. This is sufficient.
The student: The commentator specified.
The Shaykh : No, but does Ibn Malik's statement imply this?
The student: It does not imply it.
The Shaykh : It does not imply it, and for this reason Ibn Ashmun said: Ibn Malik's statement is better, because it indicates that it is used as an absolute noun, and he cited the entry of "man" (whoever) as evidence for this, unlike the commentator's statement. And this is better when we mention this, because perhaps a person who is not well-versed in the speech of the Arabs will come to you, and from the speech of the Arabs, something will come to you that indicates this. This is it.
The student: This is evidence ... from "min" (from) and "an" (about) as two nouns.
The Shaykh : The discussion now is about Ibn Malik's words and the commentator's words; they did not agree, they did not agree. This is sufficient.
The student: The commentator specified.
The Shaykh : No, but does Ibn Malik's statement imply this?
The student: It does not imply it.
The Shaykh : It does not imply it, and for this reason Ibn Ashmun said: Ibn Malik's statement is better, because it indicates that it is used as an absolute noun, and he cited the entry of "man" (whoever) as evidence for this, unlike the commentator's statement. And this is better when we mention this, because perhaps a person who is not well-versed in the speech of the Arabs will come to you, and from the speech of the Arabs, something will come to you that indicates this. This is it.