If a marriage contract is concluded with two sisters at the same time, why is it not said that it is valid for one of them?
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The questioner : O Shaykh, if a contract is concluded with two sisters at the same time.
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Why is it not said that it is valid for one of them? How can it be valid?
The Shaykh : No, it is not valid, because here the impediment and the validator coincide at the same time. As for the transaction, you find the prohibited party distinguished and the other not distinguished, but in this case, there is no distinction.
The questioner : Shaykh ... breastfeeding.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The Shaykh : Yes.
The questioner : Why is it not said that it is valid for one of them? How can it be valid?
The Shaykh : No, it is not valid, because here the impediment and the validator coincide at the same time. As for the transaction, you find the prohibited party distinguished and the other not distinguished, but in this case, there is no distinction.
The questioner : Shaykh ... breastfeeding.
The Shaykh : Huh?