Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

Explanation of the author's (may Allah have mercy on him) statement: " . . .

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : He says: Jussive. Jussive is the fourth sign of inflection. He says: Jussive is a sign "And there are two signs of jussive" "The signs of jussive are sukun and deletion". The original rule is sukun. Jussive does not apply to nouns, nor to the past tense verb, nor to the imperative verb, nor to the present tense verb when it is connected to the women's nun or the nun of emphasis. It only applies to the present tense verb under certain conditions. Therefore, we say: Jussive occurs in the present tense verb that is not built (unconjugated). In the present tense verb that is not built. I will repeat: it does not apply to nouns, nor to the past tense verb, nor to the imperative verb, nor to the built present tense verb. How many is that? Four. It applies to the present tense verb that is not built. In the present tense verb that is not built. It has two signs: sukun and deletion. As for sukun, it is the sign of jussive in the present tense verb. In the present tense verb with a sound ending. The phrase "in the present tense verb" excludes the noun. "Present tense" excludes the imperative and the past tense. "Sound ending" excludes the defective ending, because its ruling will come later. But it is necessary to add to the present tense verb: not what? Not built. Not built. Sound ending. Sound ending. Not built. Sound ending. Not built. Sound ending. Not built. So if I say "Let Zayd stand" (liyaqumna Zayd), yes. If I say "Do not stand, Zayd" (la yaqumna Zayd), with the negative particle (la nahiyyah) and "yaqumna" is a present tense verb, yet it was not put in the jussive, even though the negative particle puts verbs in the jussive. It was not put in the jussive. Why? Because it is built. Because it is built. So it is necessary to add to the present tense verb with a sound ending: not built. Not built.
All right, its example is: you say: "Zayd did not stand" (lam yaqm Zayd). "Zayd did not stand." "Yaqm" is a present tense verb with a sound ending. Therefore, it was put in the jussive with what? With sukun.
Does he not know that Allah sees? ألم يعلم بأن الله يرى
[Al-'Alaq 96:14]
Does he not know ألم يعلم
"Ya'lam" (knows) is a present tense verb with a sound ending, not built. Therefore, it was put in the jussive with what?
The student: Sukun.

The Shaykh : Yes, it was put in the jussive with sukun.
All right,
thereupon his people said to him, "Do not exult إذ قال له قومه لا تفرح
[Al-Qasas 28:76]
Do not rejoice لا تفرحْ
here, it is put in the jussive with sukun. Yes, it is put in the jussive with sukun because it is a present tense verb with a sound ending, not what? Not built.
And never think that Allah is unaware ولا تحسبن الله غافلاً
[Ibrahim 14:42]
"La" is the negative particle, and "tahsibna" is a present tense verb, but it was not put in the jussive. Why? Because it is built. Because it is built. And it was built because it was connected to the nun of emphasis. All right.
Nor is there to Him ولم يكن له كفوا
[Al-Ikhlas 112:4]
Nor is there to Him any لم يكن له كفوا
[Al-Ikhlas 112:4]
Is this put in the jussive with sukun or not? Why? Because...
The student: Present tense.

The Shaykh : It is a present tense verb with a sound ending, not built.
had no children لم يكنْ له
[An-Nisa 4:11]
There is no meeting of two still letters.
had no children لم يكن له
[An-Nisa 4:11]
The letter after it is open (mudhmal), it is not still. All right.
So, when a present tense verb comes to us in the jussive, and it is with a sound ending and not built, it is obligatory for us to make it still (sukun). So we say: "He did not stand" (lam yaqm), "He did not hit" (lam yadrib), "He did not calculate" (lam yahsib). And there are many examples. All right.
Source alathar.net

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas