Continuation of the explanation of the verse: "And before every, 'ajma' may come *** ajma'atun, ajma'un, then juma'"

The Shaykh : He said: "And before every, 'ajma' may come *** ajma'atun, ajma'un, then juma'":
The poet said:
"Oh, I wish I were a nursing infant *** carried by the Dhalafah for a year, a black one
When I cried, she would kiss me four times *** then I would have spent all my life crying, ajma'",
What? And what is it for? For her to kiss him, yes. Al-Dhalafah: It was said that it is the name of a woman, and it was said that al-Dhalafah is the beautiful woman. Is there a proof for Ibn Malik's statement in it? Yes, there is a proof, and it is his saying:
"then I would have spent all my life crying, ajma'".
Ajma': all of time, meaning without "every." He did not say: "then I would have spent all of time, ajma," yes. And in the verse there is also a proof for the permissibility of separating the emphasized word from the emphasized one, and it is his saying: "time, I cry": "I cry" is an interjected sentence. Its parallel in the Qur'an is: Read!
The student: .

The Shaykh :, so all of them are not an emphasis of the pronoun in "you gave them," but they are an emphasis of the pronoun in His saying: , and there is a separation between the emphasized word and the emphasized one. Good, he says: The discussion on "ajma" and "ajma'un" has ended, and we learned from the author's words that the majority is that it is not used for emphasis except after "every," and that it may be used without "every," yes.