Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

Reading from Ibn Aqil’s commentary (may Allah have mercy on him), with the Shaykh’s annotations: " .

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The reader: " And if it is other than *iyyaka* and its cognates, which is what is meant by his statement: 'And as for anything else, it is not obligatory to assume the object marker except in the case of conjunction, as when you say *maza ra'suka wa al-sayf*, meaning O Mazin, strike your head and beware of the sword, or in the case of repetition, such as *al-dhaygham* " ..

The Shaykh : Glory be to Allah, *maza ra'suka wa al-sayf*.
The student: O Mazin, strike.

The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: O Mazin, strike.

The Shaykh : This estimation, *maza ra'suka wa al-sayf*, its original form is *Mazin*, but is there *tarakhim* (truncation) in it or not?
The student: Yes.

The Shaykh : There is *tarakhim* by deleting the *nun* at the end; *tarakhim* is the deletion of the end of the vocative.
" Like *ya Sa'a* in the one who called upon Sa'd "
And *ra'suka wa al-sayf* is the part where the estimation occurs. What is the estimation? *Qi* (strike) *ra'suka*, so it is the object of a deleted verb, the estimation of which is *qi*. And his statement: *wa al-sayf* (and the sword), the *waw* is a conjunction letter, and *al-sayf* is the object of a deleted verb, the estimation of which is *wa ihdhar* (beware of) or *jانب* (avoid) the sword or something similar, meaning yes.
Source alathar.net

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas