Explanation of the words of Ibn Malik (may Allah have mercy on him): "Or affirmed in a future oath ***"
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : The third:
"Or affirmed in a future oath"
It means: Or it came affirmed in a future oath, and we add a fourth condition: not separated from its lam, not separated from its lam only. How many conditions are there?
The student: Three.
The Shaykh : ... future, not separated from its lam. The conditions are four, what are they? Three, four. Is 'Abd al-Wahhab with us? If it comes affirmed in an oath here? Complete it?
The student: Not separated from its lam.
The Shaykh : Future, not separated from its lam, so it confirms, and this confirms obligation. It confirms the present tense if the four conditions are met, it confirms obligation. Let us look now, Allah the Exalted said:[Al-Humazah 104:4] Yes Bala, is it included? Affirmed or negated?
The student: Affirmed.
The Shaykh : In an oath.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : And where is the oath?
The student: And my Lord.
The Shaykh : And my Lord, future or today?
The student: Future.
The Shaykh : Future, separated from its lam?
The student: Not separated.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: Not separated.
The Shaykh : [Al-Hashr 59:12] This is affirmed, in a future oath, not separated from its lam, or not?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : So by his saying: "affirmed", if it is negated, you do not give it its ruling. If it is in an oath but negated, the nūn of confirmation does not enter it. Here?
The student:.
The Shaykh :.
The student:.
The Shaykh : Here?
The student:
The Shaykh : Or will they not support them?
The student: No.
The Shaykh : What is correct? What is correct? It is not correct because it is negated.
The student:.
The Shaykh :[Al-Hashr 59:12] This is excluded by his saying: "affirmed", and his saying: "future" excludes it if I said: By Allah, I will surely beat you now. It is not permissible to say "I will surely beat you" because it is future or not?
The student: Not future.
The Shaykh : Not future, or "By Allah, I will surely take you out yesterday," what is correct? And some grammarians said it is permissible, it is permissible to say "By Allah, I will surely beat you now." Okay, and we conditioned the fourth condition?
The student: Not separated from its lam.
The Shaykh : Not separated from its lam, if it is separated from its lam, the nūn of confirmation does not attach to it. Like the saying of Allah the Exalted:[Ali 'Imran 3:158] Here?
The student:.
The Shaykh :[Ali 'Imran 3:158] This lam is for confirmation But he did not say "to Allah you will surely be gathered," why? Because it was separated from its lam in the preposition and its object. [Ali 'Imran 3:158] Is it clear? Okay, now if the four conditions are met, confirmation is obligatory. If one is absent, confirmation is prohibited. In both cases, the obligation of confirmation and the prohibition of confirmation, the obligation of confirmation and the prohibition of confirmation. When is it obligatory?
The student: When the conditions are fulfilled.
The Shaykh : When the four conditions are fulfilled, and when is it prohibited?
The student: When one is missing.
The Shaykh : If one condition from them is missing, then confirmation is prohibited. So if someone said: If you honor me, yes, in the house, I will surely honor you, is it wrong?
The student: Wrong because it is separated.
The Shaykh : Separated between the lam of confirmation and the verb. Okay, I said: If you honor me, I will not humiliate you. If you honor me, I will not humiliate you?
The student: It is not suitable.
The Shaykh : No, what is correct?
The student: Negation.
The Shaykh : Because it is negation, here? Negation cannot coexist with the nūn of confirmation. Negation cannot.
The student: The meaning differs.
The Shaykh : The meaning is the same.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : No, I will not humiliate you, I will not humiliate you ... is it correct or not correct?
The student: It is not suitable.
The Shaykh : It is not correct because it is negated, and it must be in a future oath.
"Or affirmed in a future oath".
"Or affirmed in a future oath"
It means: Or it came affirmed in a future oath, and we add a fourth condition: not separated from its lam, not separated from its lam only. How many conditions are there?
The student: Three.
The Shaykh : ... future, not separated from its lam. The conditions are four, what are they? Three, four. Is 'Abd al-Wahhab with us? If it comes affirmed in an oath here? Complete it?
The student: Not separated from its lam.
The Shaykh : Future, not separated from its lam, so it confirms, and this confirms obligation. It confirms the present tense if the four conditions are met, it confirms obligation. Let us look now, Allah the Exalted said:
He will surely be thrown into the Crusher.
لينبذنّ في الحطمةHe will surely be cast
لينبذنّSay: Yes, and by my Lord, you will surely be resurrected
قل بلى وربّي لتبعثنّAnd by my Lord, you will surely be resurrected
وربّي لتبعثنّYou will surely be resurrected
لتبعثنّThe student: Affirmed.
The Shaykh : In an oath.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : And where is the oath?
The student: And my Lord.
The Shaykh : And my Lord, future or today?
The student: Future.
The Shaykh : Future, separated from its lam?
The student: Not separated.
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: Not separated.
The Shaykh :
And by my Lord, you will surely be resurrected
وربّي لتبعثنّAnd [even] if they should aid them, they will surely turn their backs
ولئن نصروهم ليولنّ الأدبارThey will surely turn their backs
ليولنّThe student: Yes.
The Shaykh : So by his saying: "affirmed", if it is negated, you do not give it its ruling. If it is in an oath but negated, the nūn of confirmation does not enter it.
And if they are fought
ولئن قوتلواThe student:
They will not support them
لا ينصرونهمThe Shaykh :
They will not support them
لا ينصرونهمThe student:
They will not support them
لا ينصرونهمThe Shaykh :
They will not support them
لا ينصرونهمThe student:
they will not aid them
لا ينصرونهمThe Shaykh : Or will they not support them?
The student: No.
The Shaykh : What is correct? What is correct? It is not correct because it is negated.
they will not aid them
لا ينصرونهمand if they are driven out
ولئن أخرجواThe student:
they will not go out
لا يخرجونThe Shaykh :
they will not leave with them
لا يخرجون معهمThe student: Not future.
The Shaykh : Not future, or "By Allah, I will surely take you out yesterday," what is correct? And some grammarians said it is permissible, it is permissible to say "By Allah, I will surely beat you now." Okay, and we conditioned the fourth condition?
The student: Not separated from its lam.
The Shaykh : Not separated from its lam, if it is separated from its lam, the nūn of confirmation does not attach to it. Like the saying of Allah the Exalted:
And whether you die or are killed
ولئن متّم أو قتلتمThe student:
to Allah
لإلى اللهThe Shaykh :
unto Allah you will be gathered.
لإلى الله تحشرونto Allah
لإلى اللهunto Allah you will be gathered.
لإلى الله تحشرونThe student: When the conditions are fulfilled.
The Shaykh : When the four conditions are fulfilled, and when is it prohibited?
The student: When one is missing.
The Shaykh : If one condition from them is missing, then confirmation is prohibited. So if someone said: If you honor me, yes, in the house, I will surely honor you, is it wrong?
The student: Wrong because it is separated.
The Shaykh : Separated between the lam of confirmation and the verb. Okay, I said: If you honor me, I will not humiliate you. If you honor me, I will not humiliate you?
The student: It is not suitable.
The Shaykh : No, what is correct?
The student: Negation.
The Shaykh : Because it is negation, here? Negation cannot coexist with the nūn of confirmation. Negation cannot.
The student: The meaning differs.
The Shaykh : The meaning is the same.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : No, I will not humiliate you, I will not humiliate you ... is it correct or not correct?
The student: It is not suitable.
The Shaykh : It is not correct because it is negated, and it must be in a future oath.
"Or affirmed in a future oath".