Explanation of the words of Ibn Malik (may Allah have mercy on him): "And it is permissible to substitute a ya before the end *** if part of the name in both of them has been deleted"
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh : He said: "And it is permissible to substitute a ya before the end ... if part of the name in both of them has been deleted"
The student : Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: You mentioned in the previous session that we must return to the plural of broken plurals according to some of the patterns.
The Shaykh : Yes, the examples are sufficient for us.
The student: Do you mean these are dependent?
The Shaykh : Yes, the examples are sufficient for us. He said:
"And it is permissible to substitute a ya before the end"
For example, the author says that it is permissible for us to substitute a ya before the last letter, which serves as a substitute for the last letter of the deleted word. We said regarding *mustakhallif* that we delete the sin and the ta from it, yes?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : As the author said:
"And the sin and the ta from like *mustad'* remove *** for by the building of the plural, both of them are left out"
For example: *mustakhrij*, we must delete the sin and the ta from it, so we say *mukhrij*. It is permissible for us to substitute a ya for what we deleted, so we say in *mustakhrij*: *mukhayrij*. And we also say: *mukhrij*. But we say: if part of the name in both of them has been deleted, then if it has not been deleted, there is no substitution of the ya, because the ya is only a substitute for what has been deleted. So if all the letters are original, then nothing is deleted from them. And, if Allah wills, examples of this will come in the explanation.
The student : Shaykh?
The Shaykh : Yes.
The student: You mentioned in the previous session that we must return to the plural of broken plurals according to some of the patterns.
The Shaykh : Yes, the examples are sufficient for us.
The student: Do you mean these are dependent?
The Shaykh : Yes, the examples are sufficient for us. He said:
"And it is permissible to substitute a ya before the end"
For example, the author says that it is permissible for us to substitute a ya before the last letter, which serves as a substitute for the last letter of the deleted word. We said regarding *mustakhallif* that we delete the sin and the ta from it, yes?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : As the author said:
"And the sin and the ta from like *mustad'* remove *** for by the building of the plural, both of them are left out"
For example: *mustakhrij*, we must delete the sin and the ta from it, so we say *mukhrij*. It is permissible for us to substitute a ya for what we deleted, so we say in *mustakhrij*: *mukhayrij*. And we also say: *mukhrij*. But we say: if part of the name in both of them has been deleted, then if it has not been deleted, there is no substitution of the ya, because the ya is only a substitute for what has been deleted. So if all the letters are original, then nothing is deleted from them. And, if Allah wills, examples of this will come in the explanation.