Explanation of the words of Ibn Malik (may Allah have mercy on him): "And after that, compensation for what was committed from it *** like how 'Ama anta bara faqtab'."
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The Shaykh :"And after that, compensation for what was committed from it ***"
Similarly, *kana* is also deleted, and its subject and predicate remain, but what is compensated for is what is compensated for, with the subject and predicate remaining. The difference between this issue and the previous one is that in the previous one, they delete it along with its subject; they delete it along with its subject. But here, they delete it alone, and along with that, they compensate for it with *ma* and keep the predicate. Yes.
"And after that, compensation for what was committed from it ***" We will parse the verse.
*Ba'da an*: *Ba'da* is an adverb of place, and it is attached to *an*, which is attached to it, built on sukun in the position of genitive. And *ba'da an* is correct?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Correct.
The student: No.
The Shaykh : Know that it is impossible, absolutely never, to attach something to a letter. So we say *ba'da* is attached, and *an* is attached to it, in the genitive case due to attachment, and the sign of its genitive is a kasrah estimated on its end, prevented from appearing by the *hikayah* (narrative form).
"Tad'iyun": It is the subject (*mubtada'*) and it is attached, and *ma* is attached to it, built on sukun in the position of genitive.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Not correct either. Correct. Correct, it is not correct.
*Tad'iyun* is attached, and *ma* is attached to it, built on sukun, here.
The student: Genitive.
The Shaykh : Genitive, and the sign of its genitive is a kasrah estimated on its end, prevented from appearing by the *hikayah*.
*Minha*: Preposition and its object, connected to *irtakaba*.
And *irtakaba*: The sentence is the predicate of *tad'iyun*.
"Like how 'Ama anta bara faqtab'": *Ka-mithl*: The *kaf* is a preposition, and *mithl* is a noun in the genitive case by the *kaf*, and it is attached.
And *ama anta bara faqtab*: It is attached to it, in the genitive case due to attachment, and the sign of its genitive is a kasrah estimated on its end, prevented from appearing by the *hikayah*.
As for the parsing, they say: *Ama anta bara faqtab*. Look at how the grammarians (may Allah have mercy on them) manage to apply their rules, even in a forced way.
*Ama anta bara faqtab*: They say its original form is *qtab*, because *kana anta bara qtab*, because *kana anta bara*. And on this basis, they placed the cause before, so there is placing the cause before the effect. I said *qtab*, meaning *qtab* to me. I would like you to be my companion. Why? Because *kana anta dha bar*, because *kana anta bara*, because *kana anta bara*. Okay, *qtab* to me. So now, if we have the blackboard in front of us, we write the example. We say, what is its original form? *Qtab* because *kana anta dha bar*? No, because *kana anta bara*. *Qtab* because *kana anta bara*. So what did we do? They said we placed the cause, so it became what? *Lan kana anta bara qtab*. And since the cause is like a condition in the succession of its result upon it, it was good to be joined with *fa*, so it became *lan kana anta bara faqtab*. Did you understand? And what did we do now? *Lan kana*, they said: We deleted the *lam*, the *lam* of cause, so the estimation is *an kana anta bara faqtab*. Then we deleted *kana*. When we deleted it, we separated the pronoun. Because *kana anta*, when we deleted it, we separated the pronoun. Why did we separate it? Because the attached pronoun cannot be brought alone. The attached pronoun cannot be brought alone. So we separated it, and the estimation became: *an anta bara faqtab*. Okay, *an anta*? We brought *ma*, so it became: *an ma anta bara faqtab*. Then we assimilated *an* into *ma*, so it became... The road. Do you say I returned from the road?
The student: I walked from the beginning.
The Shaykh : You did not reach Mecca.
The student: The time is up, Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Yes, dictation. Ah, how?
The student: There is no new lesson.
The Shaykh : A new lesson. We heard it.
The student: If, may Allah reward you, the minutes that passed before the adhan, meaning were consumed in the lesson, there will be compensation... ten minutes.
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed
The student: ...
The Shaykh : And they are
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Perhaps, if Allah wills, in the next lesson.
The student: He went now, ten minutes.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: Ten went.
The Shaykh : Ten went.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Zayn.
The reader: In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
Praise be to Allah, and may Allah send prayers and peace upon our Prophet Muhammad, and upon his family and all his Companions.
The author (may Allah have mercy on him) said:
Similarly, *kana* is also deleted, and its subject and predicate remain, but what is compensated for is what is compensated for, with the subject and predicate remaining. The difference between this issue and the previous one is that in the previous one, they delete it along with its subject; they delete it along with its subject. But here, they delete it alone, and along with that, they compensate for it with *ma* and keep the predicate. Yes.
"And after that, compensation for what was committed from it ***" We will parse the verse.
*Ba'da an*: *Ba'da* is an adverb of place, and it is attached to *an*, which is attached to it, built on sukun in the position of genitive. And *ba'da an* is correct?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Correct.
The student: No.
The Shaykh : Know that it is impossible, absolutely never, to attach something to a letter. So we say *ba'da* is attached, and *an* is attached to it, in the genitive case due to attachment, and the sign of its genitive is a kasrah estimated on its end, prevented from appearing by the *hikayah* (narrative form).
"Tad'iyun": It is the subject (*mubtada'*) and it is attached, and *ma* is attached to it, built on sukun in the position of genitive.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Not correct either. Correct. Correct, it is not correct.
*Tad'iyun* is attached, and *ma* is attached to it, built on sukun, here.
The student: Genitive.
The Shaykh : Genitive, and the sign of its genitive is a kasrah estimated on its end, prevented from appearing by the *hikayah*.
*Minha*: Preposition and its object, connected to *irtakaba*.
And *irtakaba*: The sentence is the predicate of *tad'iyun*.
"Like how 'Ama anta bara faqtab'": *Ka-mithl*: The *kaf* is a preposition, and *mithl* is a noun in the genitive case by the *kaf*, and it is attached.
And *ama anta bara faqtab*: It is attached to it, in the genitive case due to attachment, and the sign of its genitive is a kasrah estimated on its end, prevented from appearing by the *hikayah*.
As for the parsing, they say: *Ama anta bara faqtab*. Look at how the grammarians (may Allah have mercy on them) manage to apply their rules, even in a forced way.
*Ama anta bara faqtab*: They say its original form is *qtab*, because *kana anta bara qtab*, because *kana anta bara*. And on this basis, they placed the cause before, so there is placing the cause before the effect. I said *qtab*, meaning *qtab* to me. I would like you to be my companion. Why? Because *kana anta dha bar*, because *kana anta bara*, because *kana anta bara*. Okay, *qtab* to me. So now, if we have the blackboard in front of us, we write the example. We say, what is its original form? *Qtab* because *kana anta dha bar*? No, because *kana anta bara*. *Qtab* because *kana anta bara*. So what did we do? They said we placed the cause, so it became what? *Lan kana anta bara qtab*. And since the cause is like a condition in the succession of its result upon it, it was good to be joined with *fa*, so it became *lan kana anta bara faqtab*. Did you understand? And what did we do now? *Lan kana*, they said: We deleted the *lam*, the *lam* of cause, so the estimation is *an kana anta bara faqtab*. Then we deleted *kana*. When we deleted it, we separated the pronoun. Because *kana anta*, when we deleted it, we separated the pronoun. Why did we separate it? Because the attached pronoun cannot be brought alone. The attached pronoun cannot be brought alone. So we separated it, and the estimation became: *an anta bara faqtab*. Okay, *an anta*? We brought *ma*, so it became: *an ma anta bara faqtab*. Then we assimilated *an* into *ma*, so it became... The road. Do you say I returned from the road?
The student: I walked from the beginning.
The Shaykh : You did not reach Mecca.
The student: The time is up, Shaykh.
The Shaykh : Yes, dictation. Ah, how?
The student: There is no new lesson.
The Shaykh : A new lesson. We heard it.
The student: If, may Allah reward you, the minutes that passed before the adhan, meaning were consumed in the lesson, there will be compensation... ten minutes.
The Shaykh : Yes, indeed
The student: ...
The Shaykh : And they are
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Perhaps, if Allah wills, in the next lesson.
The student: He went now, ten minutes.
The Shaykh : Yes
The student: Ten went.
The Shaykh : Ten went.
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : Zayn.
The reader: In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
Praise be to Allah, and may Allah send prayers and peace upon our Prophet Muhammad, and upon his family and all his Companions.
The author (may Allah have mercy on him) said: