Reading from Ibn Aqil’s commentary (may Allah have mercy on him), with the Shaykh’s annotations: " .
Machine translationRead the Arabic original
The reader: "And the nun in the final position is like the hamzah, and in the case of Ghaznfar, its originality is sufficient
the nun when".
The Shaykh : What? What are you saying?
The reader: "And the nun in the final position is like the hamzah, and in the case of Ghaznfar, its originality is sufficient".
The Shaykh : Yes.
The reader: "When the nun occurs at the end after an alif that is preceded by more than two letters, it is ruled as an extra letter, just as the hamzah is ruled as extra when it occurs in that position. This is like in za'faran and sakran. If it is not preceded by three letters, it is an original letter, like in makana and zamana. It is also ruled as an extra nun when it occurs after two letters and is followed by two letters, like in Ghaznfar".
The Shaykh : Yes, meaning if it occurs in the middle, it is an extra letter. Now, if we say sakran, is it preceded by an alif that is followed by three original letters, or not?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : The alif is extra, and the nun is extra. Now, makana? What?
The student: Original.
The Shaykh : Why? Because it is not preceded by anything but two letters, an alif preceded by two letters, so the nun is an original letter. And zamana? Likewise.
The student: That is why in zamana, from zaman, the nun is an original letter. Now, Ghaznfar? The nun is extra because it occurs in the middle between four letters, is that right? The author says if it is not preceded by three, it is an original letter, whether it is the last one or between two original letters. Now, Ghaznfar, what is Ghaznfar?
The student: The lion.
The Shaykh : The lion?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : How do you meter Ghaznfar?
The student: Fa'annal.
The Shaykh : Fa'annal, why don't we say fa'illal? Because the extra letter is pronounced with its own sound, so it is said fa'annal, yes.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : ...
The student: Have you not heard from the Arabs, for example, Ghaznfar?
The Shaykh : ...
The student: ...
The Shaykh : By analogy, they established rules and proceeded according to them. It is possible that it is from ghazafar, I do not know, look in al-Qamus, refer to al-Qamus from ghazafar, then it is clear.
The student: The nun occurred ...
The Shaykh : It occurred between two letters, two letters, Ghaznfar.
The student: In the middle.
The Shaykh : In the middle, if they say, if it occurs after two letters and is followed by two letters.
The student: Meaning a letter, a letter, and it is in the middle.
The Shaykh : Yes, in the middle, and it is an original letter.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes, like sanaw, it is an original letter, it occurred between a letter and a letter, yes, go on, go on, the time is up.
the nun when".
The Shaykh : What? What are you saying?
The reader: "And the nun in the final position is like the hamzah, and in the case of Ghaznfar, its originality is sufficient".
The Shaykh : Yes.
The reader: "When the nun occurs at the end after an alif that is preceded by more than two letters, it is ruled as an extra letter, just as the hamzah is ruled as extra when it occurs in that position. This is like in za'faran and sakran. If it is not preceded by three letters, it is an original letter, like in makana and zamana. It is also ruled as an extra nun when it occurs after two letters and is followed by two letters, like in Ghaznfar".
The Shaykh : Yes, meaning if it occurs in the middle, it is an extra letter. Now, if we say sakran, is it preceded by an alif that is followed by three original letters, or not?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : The alif is extra, and the nun is extra. Now, makana? What?
The student: Original.
The Shaykh : Why? Because it is not preceded by anything but two letters, an alif preceded by two letters, so the nun is an original letter. And zamana? Likewise.
The student: That is why in zamana, from zaman, the nun is an original letter. Now, Ghaznfar? The nun is extra because it occurs in the middle between four letters, is that right? The author says if it is not preceded by three, it is an original letter, whether it is the last one or between two original letters. Now, Ghaznfar, what is Ghaznfar?
The student: The lion.
The Shaykh : The lion?
The student: Yes.
The Shaykh : How do you meter Ghaznfar?
The student: Fa'annal.
The Shaykh : Fa'annal, why don't we say fa'illal? Because the extra letter is pronounced with its own sound, so it is said fa'annal, yes.
The student: ...
The Shaykh : Huh?
The student: ...
The Shaykh : ...
The student: Have you not heard from the Arabs, for example, Ghaznfar?
The Shaykh : ...
The student: ...
The Shaykh : By analogy, they established rules and proceeded according to them. It is possible that it is from ghazafar, I do not know, look in al-Qamus, refer to al-Qamus from ghazafar, then it is clear.
The student: The nun occurred ...
The Shaykh : It occurred between two letters, two letters, Ghaznfar.
The student: In the middle.
The Shaykh : In the middle, if they say, if it occurs after two letters and is followed by two letters.
The student: Meaning a letter, a letter, and it is in the middle.
The Shaykh : Yes, in the middle, and it is an original letter.
The questioner : ...
The Shaykh : Yes, like sanaw, it is an original letter, it occurred between a letter and a letter, yes, go on, go on, the time is up.