Text copied Link copied

Al-Fatawa – home

﴿ فَاسْأَلُوا أَهْلَ الذِّكْرِ إِن كُنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَمُونَ ﴾

Scholar
Search mode

The Response to Those Who Cite the Hadith of Asma' as Evidence for Uncovering a Woman's Face

Machine translationRead the Arabic original
Question:
A message has reached the program from one of our brother listeners. He says: I am the listener: (Dr. L. M.), an Egyptian working in al-Khobar. Our brother says: Dr. Yusuf al-Qaradawi has a book: The Lawful and the Forbidden (Chapter on a Woman Displaying Her Apparent Adornment): Abu Dawud narrated from Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) that Asma' bint Abi Bakr entered upon the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) wearing thin garments; so the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) turned away from her and said to her:
O Asma', when a woman reaches the age of menstruation, it is not permissible for anyone to see of her except this and this.يا أسماء إن المرأة إذا بلغت المحيض، لم يصلح أن يرى منها إلا هذا وهذا
Sunan al-Bayhaqi 10:890
and he pointed to his face and his two hands, but I have heard from you that uncovering a woman's face is forbidden.
I hope you will guide me, may Allah reward you with good.

Answer:
We have previously drawn attention to this hadith, and we explained in a previous episode—indeed, in several episodes—that this hadith is not authentic from the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) and that it is very weak from many angles. It is obligatory for anyone who mentions it in any book to clarify its weakness, and that it is not suitable to be cited as evidence; because there is a break and weakness in its chain that necessitates not citing it as evidence and not relying on it. It is narrated by Khalid ibn Daryak from Aisha, and he did not hear from her; so it is a broken chain (munqati'), and a broken chain is not cited as evidence by the scholars of knowledge; it is called weak. In its chain is a weak man named Sa'id ibn Bashir, who is also not cited as evidence. And in its chain is Qatadah from Khalid, and he is a deceiver (mudallis) and he used the abbreviation (ta'annun). These are three defects.
And a fourth defect: and that is that if this hadith were authentic, it would be understood to refer to what was before the hijab; because the woman before the hijab used to display her face and her hands, and then that was abrogated by His saying, the Exalted:
And when you ask [his wives] for something, ask them from behind a partition. That is purer for your hearts and their hearts.وَإِذَا سَأَلْتُمُوهُنَّ مَتَاعًا فَاسْأَلُوهُنَّ مِنْ وَرَاءِ حِجَابٍ ذَلِكُمْ أَطْهَرُ لِقُلُوبِكُمْ وَقُلُوبِهِنَّ
[Al-Ahzab: 53] and by His saying, the Exalted:
O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves [part] of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abusedيَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُلْ لِأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِنْ جَلابِيبِهِنَّ ذَلِكَ أَدْنَى أَنْ يُعْرَفْنَ فَلا يُؤْذَيْنَ
[Al-Ahzab: 59] and by His saying, the Exalted, in Surat al-Nur:
except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands' fathers, their sons, their husbands' sonsوَلا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلَّا لِبُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ آبَائِهِنَّ أَوْ آبَاءِ بُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ أَبْنَائِهِنَّ أَوْ أَبْنَاءِ بُعُولَتِهِنَّ..
[Al-Nur: 31] the verse. So they have no right to display their adornment to other than their mahrams, and the face is of the greatest of adornments. So it is known by this: that mentioning this hadith without drawing attention to its weakness—and that if it were authentic, it was before the revelation of the verse of the hijab—is an error. It was not befitting for anyone who mentioned it except to clarify its weakness.
And there is a fifth defect: and that is that such an action is not thought to be done by Asma' (may Allah be pleased with her), for she is a righteous, knowledgeable, and well-known woman, and she is the elder sister of Aisha, and she is the wife of al-Zubayr ibn al-Awwam, the close companion of the Messenger (peace and blessings be upon him), and he is one of the ten who were given the good tidings of Paradise. So it is not befitting for her—after the hijab—to enter upon the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) in thin garments, or with her face and hands uncovered. This is what clarifies the inauthenticity of this hadith, and that it has no basis—as previously explained—and that it is defective with multiple defects. And Allah is the One to be sought for help.

The presenter: So: the best for the woman in this situation is to cover her face.

The Shaykh: This is what is obligatory upon her, this is what is obligatory upon her; it is obligatory because it is hijab; because the face is her title indicating her beauty or her ugliness. And it is established in the two Sahihs from Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) that she said when she heard the voice of Safwan lamenting when he saw her as she had lagged behind the army, she said: "When I heard his voice, I covered my face, and he had seen me before the hijab." So it is known by this that they used to uncover their faces before the hijab, but after the hijab they used to cover them. Yes.

The presenter: May Allah bless you.
Source binbaz.org.sa

The Arabic text is copied verbatim from the original source, without any edits.

Similar fatwas